Samsung Galaxy Tab Active4 Pro 10.1" SM-T630 Black
Samsung
56 Score global
vs
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 12.7" Idea Tab Pro Luna Grey
Lenovo
76 Score global
Scores
Student
Art Design
Reading
Productivity
Business
Entertainment
Spécifications
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active4 Pro 10.1" SM-T630 | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 12.7" Idea Tab Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | 2133 MHz | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Processor (3.35 GHz ) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | DDR4 | LPDDR5X★ |
| Storage | 64 GB | 128 GB★ |
| Storage Type | — | UFS |
| Expandable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 10.1" | 12.7" |
| Resolution | 1920 px | 2944 px★ |
| Panel | LCD | LCD |
| Refresh Rate | — | 144 Hz★ |
| Brightness | — | 400 nits★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E★ |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Bluetooth 5.3★ |
| USB-C | 1 | 1 |
| Cellular | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Stylus Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stylus Model | S Pen | Lenovo Tab Pen Plus |
| Fingerprint Reader | ✓ | ✓ |
| Face Unlock | — | ✓★ |
| IP Rating | IP68 | — |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 0.68 kg | 0.62 kg★ |
| OS | Android | Android 14 |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active4 Pro 10.1" SM-T630 Black
- Strong connectivity (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong cpu (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong gpu (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong feature (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Below average screen (27th percentile)
- Below average storage (29th percentile)
- Below average ram (32th percentile)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 12.7" Idea Tab Pro Luna Grey
- Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong screen (92th percentile)92th %ile
Prix
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active4 Pro 10.1" SM-T630 Black0.141score par dollar
vs
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 12.7" Idea Tab Pro Luna Grey0.306score par dollar
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 12.7" Idea Tab Pro Luna Grey offre un rapport qualité-prix 2.2x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 12.7" Idea Tab Pro
Scores 76 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 23 specs.
