Fujifilm Fujinon XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR
Fujifilm
69 Score global
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD
Tamron
96 Score global
Scores
Budget
Video Cinema
Professional
Macro
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Portrait
Street
Spécifications
| Fujifilm Fujinon XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | Wide-Angle Zoom | Wide-Angle Zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 10 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 24 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | 14 | 16 |
| Groups | 10 | 12 |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/22 | f/16 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X-Mount | Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-M |
| Weight | 0.39 kg★ | 0.54 kg |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 191 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.16x★ | — |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Fujifilm Fujinon XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR
- Strong stabilization (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong optical (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong versatility (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong build (77th percentile)
- Below average macro (22th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (27th percentile)
- Below average aperture (30th percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong versatility (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong optical (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong stabilization (88th percentile)88th %ile
Prix
Fujifilm Fujinon XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR0.065score par dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD0.159score par dollar
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD offre un rapport qualité-prix 2.4x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD
Scores 96 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 16 specs.
