FLATIC

FLATIC

FLATIC
32 Score global
vs
ECCO SW30 Transparent

ECCO SW30 Transparent

ECCO
23 Score global

Scores

Video
FLATIC
39
ECCO
17
Product Photography
FLATIC
37
ECCO
18
Beginner
FLATIC
36
ECCO
21
Photography
FLATIC
36
ECCO
21
Wedding Events
FLATIC
33
ECCO
18
Youtube
FLATIC
31
ECCO
14
Sports Wildlife
FLATIC
26
ECCO
19
Streaming
FLATIC
26
ECCO
11
Travel
FLATIC
23
ECCO
17
Vlogging
FLATIC
23
ECCO
9

Spécifications

FLATICECCO SW30
Sensor
TypeCMOS
Size1/3-inch
Megapixels64 MP
Video
Max Resolution5K
Log Profile
Build
Weight0.78 kg

Avantages & Inconvénients

FLATIC

  • Strong video (75th percentile)
  • Strong sensor (74th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (66th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average display (24th percentile)
  • Below average burst (27th percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (30th percentile)

ECCO SW30 Transparent

  • Below average connectivity (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average video (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average display (24th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (25th percentile)

Prix

FLATIC is 11 $US cheaper (1.2x less).

FLATIC0.587score par dollar
vs
ECCO SW30 Transparent0.353score par dollar

FLATIC offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.7x meilleur

ECCO SW30 Transparent

Verdict

Gagnant: FLATIC

Scores 32 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 3 of 6 specs.

FLATIC Meilleur pour:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography

A considérer aussi