Minolta MN60WP Black
Minolta
40 Score global
vs
FLATIC
FLATIC
33 Score global
Scores
Travel
Video
Streaming
Beginner
Wedding Events
Product Photography
Photography
Sports Wildlife
Youtube
Vlogging
Spécifications
| Minolta MN60WP | FLATIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | — | 1/3-inch |
| Megapixels | 48 MP | 64 MP★ |
| ISO Range | 100★ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K★ | 5K |
| 4K FPS | 30 fps★ | — |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 2.7"★ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| Articulating | ✗ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.15 kg★ | 0.78 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓★ | — |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Minolta MN60WP Black
- Strong stabilization (72th percentile)
- Strong build (68th percentile)
- Strong sensor (67th percentile)
- Below average display (26th percentile)
- Below average burst (29th percentile)
- Below average af (34th percentile)
FLATIC
- Strong video (77th percentile)
- Strong sensor (75th percentile)
- Strong social proof (68th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average display (26th percentile)
- Below average burst (29th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (32th percentile)
Prix
Minolta MN60WP Black0.269score par dollar
vs
FLATIC0.615score par dollar
FLATIC offre un rapport qualité-prix 2.3x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Minolta MN60WP
Scores 40 overall, wins 9 of 10 usage categories and 7 of 13 specs.
