Minolta MNS10 Blue
Minolta
32 Score global
vs
Z CAM E2 E2
Z CAM
40 Score global
Scores
Streaming
Video
Beginner
Youtube
Sports Wildlife
Product Photography
Wedding Events
Photography
Travel
Vlogging
Spécifications
| Minolta MNS10 | Z CAM E2 E2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | — | micro-four-thirds |
| Megapixels | 48 MP★ | 10.279999732971191 MP |
| ISO Range | 100★ | 160 |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 120 fps★ |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K FPS | — | 120 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | 30 fps | 240 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | MOV | H.264, H.265, ProRes 422 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 2.9"★ | 1.3" |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| Articulating | ✗ | ✗ |
| Build | ||
| Weight | — | 0.76 kg★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✗ |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.0 |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Minolta MNS10 Blue
- Strong sensor (65th percentile)
- Below average display (24th percentile)
- Below average burst (27th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (30th percentile)
- Below average af (33th percentile)
Z CAM E2 E2
- Strong burst (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong video (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong connectivity (76th percentile)
- Strong build (65th percentile)
- Below average sensor (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average display (24th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (30th percentile)
Prix
Minolta MNS10 Blue0.323score par dollar
vs
Z CAM E2 E20.020score par dollar
Minolta MNS10 Blue offre un rapport qualité-prix 16.2x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Z CAM E2 E2
Scores 40 overall, wins 8 of 10 usage categories and 7 of 19 specs.
