ViewSonic VX1655 VX1655-4K-OLED 16" Black 2023
ViewSonic
65 Puntuación general
vs
MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 31.5" Black 2024
MSI
94 Puntuación general
Puntuaciones
Portable
Gaming
Office
Entertainment
Professional
Creative
Especificaciones
| ViewSonic VX1655 VX1655-4K-OLED 16" | MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 31.5" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 15.6" | 32" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Panel Type | OLED | OLED |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,700 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 240 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 1 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | — | G-Sync Compatible★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 400 nits | 1000 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 100% DCI-P3 | 99% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | 8-Bit+FRC | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 0 | 1★ |
| USB-C | 2★ | 1 |
| Speakers | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | — | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✗ |
| Power | 25W★ | — |
| Weight | 0.68 kg★ | 9.60 kg |
Pros y Contras
ViewSonic VX1655 VX1655-4K-OLED 16" Black 2023
- Strong compact (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong display (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong color (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong connectivity (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average feature (24th percentile)
MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 31.5" Black 2024
- Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (92th percentile)92th %ile
Precios
ViewSonic VX1655 VX1655-4K-OLED 16" Black 20230.131puntos por dólar
vs
MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 31.5" Black 20240.106puntos por dólar
ViewSonic VX1655 VX1655-4K-OLED 16" Black 2023 ofrece 1.2x mejor relación calidad-precio
Veredicto
Ganador: MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 31.5"
Scores 94 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 29 specs.
