Canon Beetle Blazar 32mm
Canon
44 Puntuación general
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Sony
89 Puntuación general
Puntuaciones
Video Cinema
Street
Budget
Professional
Travel
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Especificaciones
| Canon Beetle Blazar 32mm | Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 32 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 32 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | — | 9 |
| Groups | — | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | T3.2 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | T3.2 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weight | 0.29 kg | 0.12 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 55 mm | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 460 mm | 249 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.215x★ |
Pros y Contras
Canon Beetle Blazar 32mm
- Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
- Strong build (73th percentile)
- Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average optical (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
Precios
Canon Beetle Blazar 32mm0.073puntos por dólar
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.299puntos por dólar
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm ofrece 4.1x mejor relación calidad-precio
Veredicto
Ganador: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 20 specs.
