TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 Puntuación general
vs
Apple S66

Apple S66

Apple
66 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Budget
TOZO
82
Apple
69
Gaming
TOZO
79
Apple
60
Travel
TOZO
77
Apple
47
Fitness
TOZO
73
Apple
41
Commute
TOZO
70
Apple
44
Calls
TOZO
69
Apple
55
Music
TOZO
69
Apple
47

Especificaciones

TOZO Crystal PodsApple S66
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelessIn-Ear
Ear TipsMediuml
Weight0.04 kg0.09 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm13.399999618530273 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDACFast Charging, Waterproof
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.45.4
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorBluetooth
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs8 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of playYes
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs50 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count42
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5IPX7

Pros y Contras

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong anc (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong build (91th percentile)91th %ile

Apple S66

  • Strong user sentiment (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong battery (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong mic (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average anc (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Precios

Apple S66 is 11 US$ cheaper (1.6x less).

TOZO Crystal Pods2.804puntos por dólar
vs
Apple S663.493puntos por dólar

Apple S66 ofrece 1.2x mejor relación calidad-precio

Veredicto

Ganador: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 36 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Mejor en:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

También considerar