HP Pro Tower 290 G9 2023
HP
61 Puntuación general
vs
ASUS NUC NUC 15 Pro Tall Barebone Kit 2025
ASUS
49 Puntuación general
Puntuaciones
Business
Home Office
Compact
Developer
Workstation
Creator
Gaming
Especificaciones
| HP Pro Tower 290 G9 | ASUS NUC NUC 15 Pro Tall Barebone Kit | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | Intel Core i3 13100 | Intel Core Ultra 5 225H★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 4 | 14★ |
| Frequency | 3.4 GHz★ | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB | 18 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | Intel Arc 130T★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | integrated | integrated |
| VRAM | — | 16 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 8 GB★ | — |
| RAM Generation | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Storage 1 | 256 GB★ | — |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Form Factor | mid-tower | mini |
| PSU | 180W★ | 120W |
| Weight | 22.68 kg | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 0 | 3★ |
| USB Ports | 8★ | 4 |
| Thunderbolt | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| HDMI | 1x HDMI | 2x HDMI 2.1 Output |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7★ |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.4★ |
| Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet | 2.5 GbE |
| System | ||
| OS | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 |
Pros y Contras
HP Pro Tower 290 G9 2023
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (76th percentile)
- Strong reliability (71th percentile)
- Strong port (70th percentile)
- Below average ram (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average storage (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average gpu (31th percentile)
- Below average cpu (32th percentile)
ASUS NUC NUC 15 Pro Tall Barebone Kit 2025
- Strong port (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average storage (1th percentile)1th %ile
- Below average ram (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average social proof (21th percentile)
Precios
HP Pro Tower 290 G9 20230.143puntos por dólar
vs
ASUS NUC NUC 15 Pro Tall Barebone Kit 20250.094puntos por dólar
HP Pro Tower 290 G9 2023 ofrece 1.5x mejor relación calidad-precio
Veredicto
Ganador: HP Pro Tower 290 G9
Scores 61 overall, wins 2 of 7 usage categories and 6 of 25 specs.
