Ricoh GR IV HDF Black Review
The Ricoh GR IV HDF makes beautiful, soft photos with one button press, but its awful battery life and high price make it a tough sell for anyone but its biggest fans.
Overview
The Ricoh GR IV HDF is a camera for a very specific person. It's not trying to be your do-everything mirrorless workhorse. Instead, it's a beautifully built, pocketable tool with one killer trick: a built-in Highlight Diffusion Filter that gives you soft, dreamy, film-like photos at the press of a button. If you want a camera that feels like an extension of your hand and makes you see light differently, this is it. Just know you're paying a premium for that unique character.
Performance
The performance story is a tale of two extremes. The build quality and IBIS are shockingly good for such a small camera, landing in the 99th and 88th percentiles respectively. You can handhold slow shots with confidence. But the battery life is the absolute worst in its class, a 0th percentile disaster at just 250 shots. You'll be buying spare batteries, no question. The autofocus and sensor are just okay, but that's not really the point here.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- The HDF filter is magical and instantly accessible. 90th
- Incredible, tank-like build quality in a tiny package. 89th
- IBIS is fantastic for such a compact body. 83th
- The genuine leather finger strap is a nice touch. 76th
Cons
- The battery life is frankly embarrassing.
- It's wildly expensive for what you get on paper. 4th
- Not weather-sealed, which feels like a miss at this price. 29th
- Video and burst shooting are afterthoughts.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Sensor
| Type | Type: Primary color filter CMOS. Size: 23.3mm x 15.5mm |
| Megapixels | 25.74 |
| ISO Range | 100 |
Autofocus
| AF Type | Auto-area AF, Zone AF, Select AF, Pinpoint AF, Tracking AF, Cont |
Shooting
| Max Shutter | 1/4000 |
Display & EVF
| Screen Size | 3 |
| Touchscreen | Yes |
| Articulating | No |
| EVF Resolution | 1037000 |
Build
| Weight | 0.3 kg / 0.6 lbs |
| Battery Life | 250 |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| USB | USB-C |
| Hot Shoe | Yes |
Value & Pricing
At $1,597, the value proposition is tough. Objectively, it's a bad deal. You can get a full-frame mirrorless camera with way better specs for less. But value here isn't about specs. It's about the experience and that unique HDF look. If that look is exactly what you want, and you value pocketability and build above all else, then it's worth it. For everyone else, it's a hard pass.
Price History
vs Competition
This camera lives in its own world, but if you're looking at alternatives, the Fujifilm X-E5 is the obvious choice. It's a proper interchangeable lens camera with classic looks and Fuji's great film simulations, offering way more flexibility for less money. The Sony ZV-E10 II is the pick if video or content creation is a priority. The Ricoh GR IV HDF only makes sense if you're absolutely committed to its fixed-lens, pocketable form factor and its specific, filter-based magic.
| Spec | Ricoh GR IV HDF | Nikon Z Nikon Z9 Mirrorless Camera | Canon EOS R Canon EOS R6 Mark II Mirrorless Camera | Sony Alpha Sony a9 III Mirrorless Camera | Fujifilm X-H FUJIFILM X-H2 Mirrorless Camera | Panasonic Lumix GH Panasonic LUMIX GH7 Mirrorless Camera with 12-35mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact | Mirrorless | Mirrorless | Mirrorless | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Sensor | 25.7MP | 45.7MP Full Frame | 24.2MP Full Frame | 24.6MP Full Frame | 40.2MP APS-C | 25.2MP Four Thirds |
| AF Points | - | 493 | 1053 | 759 | 425 | 315 |
| Burst FPS | - | 30 | 40 | 120 | 20 | 75 |
| Video | - | 8K | 4K @60fps | 4K @120fps | 8K @60fps | 5K |
| IBIS | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | true | true | true | false |
| Weight (g) | 261 | 1179 | 590 | 726 | 590 | 726 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Af | Evf | Build | Burst | Video | Sensor | Battery | Display | Connectivity | Social Proof | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricoh GR IV HDF | 42.5 | 88.6 | 4.4 | 36.3 | 28.7 | 63.6 | 0.4 | 75.8 | 82.8 | 51.4 | 90 |
| Nikon Z 9 Compare | 97 | 97.5 | 99.6 | 92.1 | 97.4 | 98.9 | 99.2 | 87 | 96.1 | 92.4 | 90 |
| Canon EOS R 6 Mark II Compare | 99.1 | 96.2 | 96.8 | 95.9 | 89.9 | 94.9 | 99.4 | 95.6 | 96.1 | 98 | 90 |
| Sony Alpha a9 III Compare | 98.1 | 99.3 | 98.6 | 99 | 97.4 | 96.4 | 97.1 | 87 | 96.1 | 92.4 | 99.6 |
| Fujifilm X-H 2 Compare | 95.6 | 99 | 87.2 | 92.1 | 100 | 92.3 | 99 | 95.6 | 96.1 | 98 | 98.9 |
| Panasonic Lumix GH 7 Compare | 94.2 | 96.2 | 81.9 | 98 | 94.8 | 73.1 | 96.4 | 87 | 96.1 | 98 | 99.4 |
Verdict
I can only recommend the Ricoh GR IV HDF to a niche within a niche. You need to be a photographer who prioritizes a specific, nostalgic aesthetic and ultimate pocketability over everything else—battery life, versatility, and value. For that person, it's a perfect, if expensive, tool. For 99% of shooters, even enthusiasts, a Fujifilm or Sony will be a smarter, more capable choice. This is a luxury item for a very specific taste.