Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony
89 Overall Score
vs
Leica Remus-M Blazar 100mm

Leica Remus-M Blazar 100mm

Leica
55 Overall Score

Scores

Video Cinema
Sony
93
Leica
60
Street
Sony
92
Leica
67
Budget
Sony
87
Leica
59
Professional
Sony
86
Leica
50
Travel
Sony
85
Leica
58
Portrait
Sony
80
Leica
68
Wildlife Sports
Sony
79
Leica
50
Landscape
Sony
69
Leica
37
Macro
Sony
64
Leica
23

Specifications

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mmLeica Remus-M Blazar 100mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm33 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm100 mm
Elements9
Groups8
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements1
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5T2.8
Min Aperture3.5-5.6T1.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades716
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weight0.12 kg0.11 kg
Filter Thread41 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance249 mm
Max Magnification0.215x

Pros & Cons

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile

Leica Remus-M Blazar 100mm

  • Strong bokeh (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83th percentile)83th %ile
  • Below average macro (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average optical (16th percentile)16th %ile

Pricing

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm is $2,198 cheaper (8.4x less).

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.299score per dollar
vs
Leica Remus-M Blazar 100mm0.022score per dollar

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm offers 13.6x better value for money

Leica Remus-M Blazar 100mm

Verdict

Winner: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 20 specs.

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider