TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 Overall Score
vs
Apple V100

Apple V100

Apple
28 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
TOZO
82
Apple
41
Gaming
TOZO
79
Apple
20
Travel
TOZO
77
Apple
17
Fitness
TOZO
73
Apple
15
Commute
TOZO
70
Apple
16
Calls
TOZO
69
Apple
21
Music
TOZO
69
Apple
17

Specifications

TOZO Crystal PodsApple V100
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsMedium3 size silicone gels
Weight0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-CLightning
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CLightning
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOtherSiri
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

Pros & Cons

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong anc (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong build (91th percentile)91th %ile

Apple V100

  • Strong social proof (66th percentile)
  • Below average sound (27th percentile)
  • Below average comfort (29th percentile)
  • Below average anc (29th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (31th percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

TOZO Crystal Pods2.804score per dollar
vs
Apple V1000.920score per dollar

TOZO Crystal Pods offers 3.0x better value for money

TOZO Crystal Pods

Apple V100

Verdict

Winner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 21 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider