Sigma fp fp
Sigma
60 Overall Score
vs
Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMPK Pink
Kodak
24 Overall Score
Scores
Travel
Product Photography
Sports Wildlife
Wedding Events
Photography
Streaming
Beginner
Video
Youtube
Vlogging
Specifications
| Sigma fp fp | Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMPK | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | back-illuminated 35mm full-frame Bayer sensor★ | — |
| Size | full-frame | — |
| Megapixels | 24.600000381469727 MP★ | — |
| ISO Range | 100★ | — |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | 49★ | — |
| AF Type | Contrast Detection: 49 | — |
| Eye AF | ✓★ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 18 fps★ | — |
| Burst (Electronic) | 18 fps★ | — |
| Max Shutter | 1/8000 | — |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓★ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K★ | — |
| 4K FPS | 30 fps★ | — |
| 1080p FPS | 120 fps★ | — |
| 10-bit | ✓★ | — |
| RAW Video | ✓★ | — |
| Codec | CinemaDNG | — |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3.2"★ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✓★ | — |
| Articulating | ✗ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.37 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✓★ |
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-C | — |
| HDMI | Micro-HDMI 1.4 | — |
| Hot Shoe | ✓★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Sigma fp fp
- Strong sensor (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong burst (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Strong video (70th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average evf (34th percentile)
Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMPK Pink
- Below average video (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average build (21th percentile)
- Below average display (24th percentile)
- Below average sensor (25th percentile)
Pricing
Sigma fp fp0.028score per dollar
vs
Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMPK Pink0.242score per dollar
Kodak Smile+ RODSMPCAMPK Pink offers 8.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma fp fp
Scores 60 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 18 of 27 specs.
