Denash
Denash
35 Overall Score
vs
Olympus OM-D E-M10 E-M10 Mark IV Silver 2020
Olympus
64 Overall Score
Scores
Streaming
Beginner
Youtube
Vlogging
Video
Product Photography
Photography
Sports Wildlife
Wedding Events
Travel
Specifications
| Denash | Olympus OM-D E-M10 E-M10 Mark IV | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | — | MOS |
| Size | — | micro-four-thirds |
| Megapixels | 75 MP★ | 20.299999237060547 MP |
| ISO Range | — | 200★ |
| Processor | — | TruePic VIII |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | No data | |
| AF Type | — | Contrast Detection: 121 |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Animal AF | — | ✓★ |
| Subject Detection | — | ✓★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 15 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/16000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 5K | 4K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 30 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 60 fps★ |
| Log Profile | ✓★ | — |
| Codec | — | H.264 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3" | 3" |
| Touchscreen | — | ✓★ |
| Articulating | ✓ | ✓ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 2.4M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✗ |
| Weight | — | 0.34 kg★ |
| Battery Life | — | 360 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✓★ |
| USB | — | Micro-USB 2.0★ |
| HDMI | — | Micro-HDMI |
| Hot Shoe | — | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
Denash
- Strong sensor (78th percentile)
- Strong video (75th percentile)
- Below average burst (27th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (30th percentile)
- Below average af (33th percentile)
- Below average evf (34th percentile)
Olympus OM-D E-M10 E-M10 Mark IV Silver 2020
- Strong battery (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong display (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Strong stabilization (76th percentile)
- Strong af (76th percentile)
- Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile
Pricing
Denash0.469score per dollar
vs
Olympus OM-D E-M10 E-M10 Mark IV Silver 20200.106score per dollar
Denash offers 4.4x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Olympus OM-D E-M10 E-M10 Mark IV
Scores 64 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 17 of 30 specs.
