Xiaomi POCO F8 Ultra 6.9Global Version 50Mp SD8 Elite 16/512GB Gen5 Review

The Poco F8 Ultra asks for $900 but delivers middling scores across the board. It's a big-screen phone with a big problem: it's not good enough.

Xiaomi POCO F8 Ultra 6.9Global Version 50Mp SD8 Elite 16/512GB Gen5 cellphone
1.9 Gesamtbewertung

The 30-Second Version

The Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra is a 6.9-inch Android phone with a flagship chip and a $900 price tag, but it delivers underwhelming performance and a poor camera. It's not a good value compared to its competitors.

Overview

The Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra is a big-screen Android phone with some flagship ambitions, but it lands in a tricky spot. People searching for 'big Android phones' or 'phones with Snapdragon 8 Elite' will find it, but at a $900 price tag, it's competing directly with established giants. The specs on paper are interesting: a 6.9-inch AMOLED screen with Dolby Vision, the latest Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chip, and a massive 6500mAh battery. It's unlocked and supports 5G, which is a plus. But our data shows this phone has some serious issues that make it a hard sell.

Performance

The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor is a top-tier chip, but in the Poco F8 Ultra, it doesn't seem to deliver. Our performance benchmarks put it in the 17th percentile, which means it lags behind most phones we test, including many with older or less powerful chips. That's a real letdown for a phone with this processor. In practice, you might notice slower app launches, more stuttering in games, or just general sluggishness compared to other $900 phones. Having a great chip on paper doesn't guarantee a great experience.

Performance Percentiles

Build 40.2
Camera 34.8
Battery 35.3
Display 28.8
Feature 5.7
Performance 16.2
Connectivity 32.8
Social Proof 14.3

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Large 6.9-inch AMOLED display with Dolby Vision support.
  • Top-of-the-line Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor (on paper).
  • Very high storage option (512GB).
  • Unlocked and 5G capable.
  • Big 6500mAh battery capacity.

Cons

  • Real-world performance is disappointing and lags behind competitors. 6th
  • Camera system is a major weak spot. 14th
  • Display quality scores are underwhelming despite specs. 16th
  • Overall feature set is one of the worst we've seen. 29th
  • Very low customer rating and social proof.

Specifications

Full Specifications

Value & Pricing

At $900, this phone is asking you to pay flagship money. But our scores show it delivers middle-of-the-pack or worse performance in almost every category except raw storage size. You're essentially paying for a big screen and a battery spec. For the same price, you could get a Galaxy S26, a Pixel 10, or an iPhone 15, all of which will offer a much more polished and performant experience. This phone's value proposition is weak.

900 $

vs Competition

Let's name some names. The Samsung Galaxy S26 at this price will have a better display, a vastly better camera, and smoother performance. The Google Pixel 10 will likely crush it in camera quality and software polish. Even the Motorola Moto G in this competitive list, which is usually more budget-focused, might offer a more balanced experience for less money. The OnePlus 15 is another direct competitor with a similar chip but historically better optimization. The Poco F8 Ultra loses out in almost every head-to-head.

Spec Xiaomi POCO F8 Ultra 6.9Global Version 50Mp SD8 Elite 16/512GB Gen5 Samsung Galaxy Samsung - Galaxy S26 Ultra 512GB (Unlocked) - Motorola Moto G Motorola - moto g stylus 2025 256GB (Unlocked) - Google Pixel Google - Pixel 10 Pro 256GB (Unlocked) - Obsidian OnePlus OnePlus OnePlus - 15 512GB (Unlocked) - Infinite Black Apple iPhone Apple - Pre-Owned Excellent iPhone 16 Pro 5G 128GB
Screen Size - 6.9 6.7 6.3 6.8 6.3
Display Type - OLED OLED OLED OLED OLED
Refresh Rate - 120 120 120 120 120
Processor - Snapdragon® 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 3.78 GHz 8 Elite Gen 5 Apple A18 Pro
RAM (GB) - 12 8 16 16 8
Storage (GB) - 512 256 256 512 128
Rear Camera Mp - 200 50 50 50 48
Front Camera Mp - 12 32 42 32 12
Battery Capacity Mah - 5000 5000 4870 7300 3582
Charging Wattage - 60 68 - - -
Wireless Charging - true true false - true
Five (g) - true true true true true
Water Resistance - IP68 IP68 IP68 IP69 IP68
Operating System - Android 16 Android 15 Android 16 Android 16 iPadOS 18
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product BuildCameraBatteryDisplayFeaturePerformanceConnectivitySocial Proof
Xiaomi POCO F8 Ultra 6.9Global Version 50Mp SD8 Elite 16/512GB Gen5 40.234.835.328.85.716.232.814.3
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Compare 99.399.999.899.799.799.899.192.1
Motorola Moto G stylus 2025 Compare 99.996.999.999.710086.699.999.8
Google Pixel 10 Pro Compare 99.3999097.98983.298.798
OnePlus OnePlus 15 Compare 92.799.898.697.794.710099.599.8
Apple iPhone Pre-Owned Excellent 16 Pro 5G Compare 99.399.488.898.486.297.494.698

Common Questions

Q: Is the Poco F8 Ultra good for gaming?

Not really. Despite having the Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, our performance benchmarks show it lags behind most phones, so you'll likely experience stuttering and slower frame rates in games.

Q: How does the Poco F8 Ultra camera compare to a Pixel?

The camera is a major weak spot for the Poco F8 Ultra, scoring in the bottom third of phones we test. A Google Pixel phone will have a significantly better camera system.

Q: Is the Poco F8 Ultra battery life good?

It has a large 6500mAh capacity, but our battery life score is mediocre. Real-world endurance may not live up to the spec.

Q: Should I buy a Poco F8 Ultra or a Samsung Galaxy?

Buy the Samsung Galaxy. At the same $900 price, the Galaxy S26 will offer better performance, a better display, and a much better camera experience.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this phone if you care about camera quality, smooth performance, or overall software polish. It's also not for anyone who wants a proven, reliable flagship experience. If you just want a huge screen and are willing to accept major compromises everywhere else, maybe consider it, but we'd suggest looking at older Galaxy Note models or other large-screen alternatives instead.

Verdict

Should you buy this? No, not unless you have a very specific and unusual need that only this phone meets. For almost everyone, this is a bad deal. You're spending $900 on a phone that performs poorly, has a bad camera, and doesn't excel in any area except having a physically large screen and a big battery capacity. Our data strongly suggests you'll be disappointed. Look at the competitors instead.