MSI MAG MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" Black 2025
MSI
90 Gesamtbewertung
vs
ASUS ROG Strix XG279CNS 27" Black
ASUS
69 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Spezifikationen
| MSI MAG MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" | ASUS ROG Strix XG279CNS 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 27" | 27" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Panel Type | QD-OLED★ | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz | 380 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | 0.30000001192092896 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro | G-Sync Compatible★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 1000 nits★ | 400 nits |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3 | 110% sRGB |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | 8-bit |
| HDR | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | DisplayHDR 400 |
| HDR Support | HDR | HDR |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 1 | 1 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Power | — | 20W★ |
| Weight | 8.00 kg | 6.50 kg★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
MSI MAG MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" Black 2025
- Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong feature (86th percentile)86th %ile
ASUS ROG Strix XG279CNS 27" Black
- Strong performance (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong color (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Strong compact (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average social proof (7th percentile)7th %ile
Preise
MSI MAG MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" Black 20250.141Score pro Dollar
vs
ASUS ROG Strix XG279CNS 27" Black0.348Score pro Dollar
ASUS ROG Strix XG279CNS 27" Black bietet 2.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: MSI MAG MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27"
Scores 90 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 6 of 28 specs.
