Samsung QET QE75T 75"
Samsung
42 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4025QW 39.7" Black, Silver, Dual Color 2025
Dell
94 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Office
Professional
Entertainment
Gaming
Creative
Portable
Spezifikationen
| Samsung QET QE75T 75" | Dell UltraSharp U4025QW 39.7" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 75" | 39.7" |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 | 5120 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | LCD | IPS★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
| Curved | — | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 2,500 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 8 ms | 5 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | — | Adaptive-Sync |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 300 nits | 600 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 16.7 Million Colors (8-Bit) | DCI-P3 99%, Display P3 99%, sRGB 100%, BT.709 100% |
| Color Depth | 8-bit | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR 600 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR600 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | — | 1★ |
| USB-C | — | 3★ |
| Thunderbolt | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Speakers | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | — | ✓★ |
| Tilt | — | ✓★ |
| Swivel | — | ✓★ |
| Pivot | — | ✗ |
| VESA Mount | 400x400 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Power | 171W★ | 380W |
| Weight | — | 8.35 kg★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Samsung QET QE75T 75"
- Strong display (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Below average performance (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average feature (23th percentile)
- Below average compact (25th percentile)
Dell UltraSharp U4025QW 39.7" Black, Silver, Dual Color 2025
- Strong display (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong color (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
Preise
Samsung QET QE75T 75"0.023Score pro Dollar
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4025QW 39.7" Black, Silver, Dual Color 20250.079Score pro Dollar
Dell UltraSharp U4025QW 39.7" Black, Silver, Dual Color 2025 bietet 3.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Dell UltraSharp U4025QW 39.7"
Scores 94 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 30 specs.
