Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm
Viltrox
73 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony Remus-M REM33-E 33mm
Sony
33 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Street
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Macro
Professional
Video Cinema
Travel
Landscape
Spezifikationen
| Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm | Sony Remus-M REM33-E 33mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 56 mm | 33 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 56 mm | 33 mm |
| Elements | 11 | — |
| Groups | 9 | — |
| ED Elements | 4★ | — |
| Coating | HD nano-coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | 16★ | 22 |
| Min Aperture | 1.7 | 1.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 16★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weight | 0.17 kg★ | — |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM★ | — |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 550 mm | 488 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:9.09★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong optical (69th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sony Remus-M REM33-E 33mm
- Below average optical (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average aperture (24th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Preise
Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm0.510Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony Remus-M REM33-E 33mm0.033Score pro Dollar
Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm bietet 15.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm
Scores 73 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 19 specs.
