Samsung

Samsung

Samsung
12 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Acer Swift Go 16 16" SFG16-72T-71UL Steel Gray 2026

Acer Swift Go 16 16" SFG16-72T-71UL Steel Gray 2026

Acer
66 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Entertainment
Samsung
12
Acer
67
Developer
Samsung
11
Acer
60
Student
Samsung
15
Acer
59
Business
Samsung
15
Acer
56
Compact
Samsung
12
Acer
54
Creator
Samsung
5
Acer
34
Gaming
Samsung
3
Acer
18

Spezifikationen

SamsungAcer Swift Go 16 16" SFG16-72T-71UL
Processor
CPUIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
CPU Multi-Core ScoreKeine Daten
24,653
Cores16
Frequency1.4 GHz
L3 Cache24 MB
Graphics
GPUIntel Arc Graphics
GPU Benchmark ScoreKeine Daten
5,496
Typeintegrated
VRAM16 GB
VRAM TypeShared
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB
RAM GenerationLPDDR5X
Storage 11 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSD
Display
Size16"
Resolution1920 px
PanelIPS
Refresh Rate60 Hz
Brightness350 nits
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2
USB Ports2
ThunderboltThunderbolt 4
HDMI2 x HDMIHDMI 2.1
Wi-FiWi-Fi 4Wi-Fi 7
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3
Physical
Weight1.60 kg
OSWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

Samsung

  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong reliability (78th percentile)
  • Below average storage (1th percentile)1th %ile
  • Below average port (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average ram (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average gpu (18th percentile)18th %ile

Acer Swift Go 16 16" SFG16-72T-71UL Steel Gray 2026

  • Strong storage (81th percentile)81th %ile
  • Strong port (78th percentile)
  • Strong cpu (76th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (73th percentile)
  • Below average reliability (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average compact (34th percentile)

Preise

Samsung is 829 $ cheaper (8.0x less).

Samsung0.105Score pro Dollar
vs
Acer Swift Go 16 16" SFG16-72T-71UL Steel Gray 20260.070Score pro Dollar

Samsung bietet 1.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Acer Swift Go 16 16" SFG16-72T-71UL Steel Gray 2026

Fazit

Gewinner: Acer Swift Go 16 16" SFG16-72T-71UL

Scores 66 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 21 of 27 specs.

Acer Swift Go 16 16" SFG16-72T-71UL Besser bei:

GamingCompactCreatorStudentBusinessDeveloperEntertainment

Auch in Betracht ziehen