TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 Gesamtbewertung
vs
KZ Gale

KZ Gale

KZ
24 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
TOZO
82
KZ
30
Gaming
TOZO
79
KZ
30
Travel
TOZO
77
KZ
16
Fitness
TOZO
73
KZ
13
Commute
TOZO
70
KZ
14
Calls
TOZO
69
KZ
27
Music
TOZO
69
KZ
13

Spezifikationen

TOZO Crystal PodsKZ Gale
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelessover-ear
Ear TipsMedium3 different silicone ear tips
Weight0.04 kg
Audio
Driver TypedynamicSuper-Linear Driver
Driver Size10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω24 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDACKZ Gale in-Ear Monitor Headphones Gaming with Dual Mic, Wide Frequency Response, Super-Linear Driver, Fit for Gaming and Music, Type-C with EQ Adjuster
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count42
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

Vor- & Nachteile

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong anc (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong build (91th percentile)91th %ile

KZ Gale

  • Strong mic (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (21th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (24th percentile)
  • Below average sound (27th percentile)
  • Below average comfort (29th percentile)

Preise

Both products are similarly priced.

TOZO Crystal Pods2.804Score pro Dollar
vs
KZ Gale0.900Score pro Dollar

TOZO Crystal Pods bietet 3.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

TOZO Crystal Pods

Fazit

Gewinner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 34 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Auch in Betracht ziehen