TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Samsung

Samsung

Samsung
20 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
TOZO
82
Samsung
27
Gaming
TOZO
79
Samsung
23
Travel
TOZO
77
Samsung
16
Fitness
TOZO
73
Samsung
13
Commute
TOZO
70
Samsung
15
Calls
TOZO
69
Samsung
17
Music
TOZO
69
Samsung
21

Spezifikationen

TOZO Crystal PodsSamsung
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelessin-ear
Ear TipsMedium
Weight0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm12 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDACUSB C Wired Gaming Earbuds, in-Ear Headphones with Built-in DAC Sound Card, Low-Latency, 5 EQ Modes, Vocal Enhancement & Microphone, Compatible with iPhone 15/16 Series, Samsung S22/S23/S24
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

Vor- & Nachteile

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong anc (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong build (91th percentile)91th %ile

Samsung

  • Below average connectivity (21th percentile)
  • Below average comfort (29th percentile)
  • Below average anc (29th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (31th percentile)

Preise

Both products are similarly priced.

TOZO Crystal Pods2.804Score pro Dollar
vs
Samsung0.677Score pro Dollar

TOZO Crystal Pods bietet 4.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

TOZO Crystal Pods

Fazit

Gewinner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 34 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Auch in Betracht ziehen