Fhumsh i17
Fhumsh
41 Gesamtbewertung
vs
TOZO NC9
TOZO
71 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Gaming
Calls
Commute
Travel
Music
Fitness
Spezifikationen
| Fhumsh i17 | TOZO NC9 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | — | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | S, M, L | six sizes |
| Weight | — | 0.05 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 14 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB★ |
| Codecs | Wireless Earbuds, Bluetooth 5.4 Headphones HiFi Stereo 50H Playback LED Digital Display Ear Buds with ENC Noise Canceling Headset, IPX7 Waterproof Earphones for Running/Workout (Black) | TOZO NC9 Hybrid Active Noise Cancelling Wireless Earbuds 59H Playtime with LED Display Charger Case, 6 Mics ENC Clear Call Headphones IPX8 Waterproof, Green |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | Environmental Noise Cancellation | hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.4★ | 5.3 |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 7.5 hrs | 14 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | Type-C fast charging | Yes★ |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 50 hrs | 59 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | activate voice assistants | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | — | TOZO |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX7 | IPX8 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Fhumsh i17
- Strong battery (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong anc (79th percentile)
- Strong connectivity (71th percentile)
- Strong mic (65th percentile)
- Below average sound (27th percentile)
- Below average comfort (28th percentile)
- Below average build (33th percentile)
TOZO NC9
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong battery (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong connectivity (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average build (33th percentile)
Preise
Fhumsh i174.320Score pro Dollar
vs
TOZO NC92.519Score pro Dollar
Fhumsh i17 bietet 1.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: TOZO NC9
Scores 71 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 33 specs.
