RED

RED

RED
41 Gesamtbewertung
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
RED
51
TOZO
81
Gaming
RED
45
TOZO
79
Travel
RED
27
TOZO
77
Fitness
RED
30
TOZO
73
Calls
RED
35
TOZO
69
Commute
RED
24
TOZO
69
Music
RED
40
TOZO
69

Spezifikationen

REDTOZO Crystal Pods
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styleear-hooktrue wireless
Ear TipsXS, S, M, LMedium
Weight0.10 kg0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size11 mm10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsSBC, AACLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.05.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life16 hrs7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantVoice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX7IPX5

Vor- & Nachteile

RED

  • Strong connectivity (78th percentile)
  • Strong sound (76th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (75th percentile)
  • Strong comfort (71th percentile)
  • Below average battery (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average anc (29th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (31th percentile)
  • Below average build (33th percentile)

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong anc (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong build (91th percentile)91th %ile

Preise

RED is 7 $ cheaper (1.3x less).

RED1.783Score pro Dollar
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods2.794Score pro Dollar

TOZO Crystal Pods bietet 1.6x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

Gewinner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Auch in Betracht ziehen