Samsung EAPC6-S

Samsung EAPC6-S

Samsung
52 Gesamtbewertung
vs
JLab GO Air Pop

JLab GO Air Pop

JLab
78 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Samsung
59
JLab
82
Fitness
Samsung
50
JLab
72
Travel
Samsung
41
JLab
63
Gaming
Samsung
41
JLab
61
Calls
Samsung
35
JLab
59
Music
Samsung
44
JLab
58
Commute
Samsung
40
JLab
56

Spezifikationen

Samsung EAPC6-SJLab GO Air Pop
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing StyleIn Eartrue wireless
Ear TipsSSmall, Medium, Large
Weight0.03 kg0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size14.199999809265137 mm6 mm
Drivers2
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity103 dB
CodecsLightweight, Microphone Included, Surround Sound, Tangle Free Cord, Volume ControlSBC
SurroundLightweight, Microphone Included, Surround Sound, Tangle Free Cord, Volume Control
Noise Control
ANC
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.3
ProfilesHSP, HFP, A2DP, AVRCP
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorUSB Type CBluetooth
Range9.100000381469727 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10 min for 1 hour playback
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery24 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count2
Features
Voice AssistantSiri, Google
Touch Controls
AppiOSJLab App
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceWaterproofIPX4

Vor- & Nachteile

Samsung EAPC6-S

  • Strong comfort (71th percentile)
  • Strong build (70th percentile)

JLab GO Air Pop

  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong build (79th percentile)

Preise

Samsung EAPC6-S is 10 $ cheaper (2.0x less).

Samsung EAPC6-S5.230Score pro Dollar
vs
JLab GO Air Pop3.922Score pro Dollar

Samsung EAPC6-S bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fazit

Gewinner: JLab GO Air Pop

Scores 78 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 34 specs.

JLab GO Air Pop Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Auch in Betracht ziehen