BACKWIN Wired in-Ear

BACKWIN Wired in-Ear

BACKWIN
39 Gesamtbewertung
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
BACKWIN
46
TOZO
82
Gaming
BACKWIN
33
TOZO
79
Travel
BACKWIN
30
TOZO
77
Fitness
BACKWIN
24
TOZO
73
Commute
BACKWIN
30
TOZO
70
Calls
BACKWIN
32
TOZO
69
Music
BACKWIN
29
TOZO
69

Spezifikationen

BACKWIN Wired in-EarTOZO Crystal Pods
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsS, M, LMedium
Weight0.04 kg0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size3.5 mm10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

Vor- & Nachteile

BACKWIN Wired in-Ear

  • Strong comfort (71th percentile)
  • Strong anc (70th percentile)
  • Strong mic (65th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (26th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong anc (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong build (91th percentile)91th %ile

Preise

BACKWIN Wired in-Ear is 18 $ cheaper (2.5x less).

BACKWIN Wired in-Ear

TOZO Crystal Pods

Fazit

Gewinner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Auch in Betracht ziehen