CCA AZ09

CCA AZ09

CCA
42 Gesamtbewertung
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
CCA
46
TOZO
82
Gaming
CCA
42
TOZO
79
Travel
CCA
31
TOZO
77
Fitness
CCA
44
TOZO
73
Commute
CCA
27
TOZO
70
Calls
CCA
26
TOZO
69
Music
CCA
38
TOZO
69

Spezifikationen

CCA AZ09TOZO Crystal Pods
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styleear-hooktrue wireless
Ear TipsMedium
Weight0.06 kg0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAACLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.45.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life6 hrs7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery30 hrs35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceWaterproofIPX5

Vor- & Nachteile

CCA AZ09

  • Strong connectivity (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong comfort (71th percentile)
  • Strong build (70th percentile)
  • Strong sound (66th percentile)
  • Below average battery (23th percentile)
  • Below average anc (29th percentile)
  • Below average mic (35th percentile)

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong anc (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong build (91th percentile)91th %ile

Preise

Both products are similarly priced.

CCA AZ091.387Score pro Dollar
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods2.804Score pro Dollar

TOZO Crystal Pods bietet 2.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

CCA AZ09

TOZO Crystal Pods

Fazit

Gewinner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Auch in Betracht ziehen