MSI Aegis ZS2 C7NVP-1435US Black 2025

MSI Aegis ZS2 C7NVP-1435US Black 2025

MSI
89 Gesamtbewertung
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
92 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Home Office
MSI
92
HP
83
Gaming
MSI
86
HP
92
Creator
MSI
82
HP
87
Developer
MSI
84
HP
87
Workstation
MSI
85
HP
86
Business
MSI
85
HP
84
Compact
MSI
28
HP
29

Spezifikationen

MSI Aegis ZS2 C7NVP-1435USHP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 9 7900XAMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core Score
51,294
31,207
Cores128
Frequency4.7 GHz3.7 GHz
L3 Cache128 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPUNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark Score
28,796
28,796
Typediscretediscrete
VRAM12 GB12 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR7GDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 12 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeSSDSSD
Build
Form Factormid-towermid-tower
PSU850W
Weight12.20 kg14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2
USB Ports108
Thunderbolt0
HDMI1x HDMI
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetoothBluetooth 5.3
EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

MSI Aegis ZS2 C7NVP-1435US Black 2025

  • Strong social proof (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong cpu (91th percentile)91th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong storage (84th percentile)84th %ile

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong user sentiment (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong port (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Preise

Both products are similarly priced.

MSI Aegis ZS2 C7NVP-1435US Black 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

Fazit

Gewinner: MSI Aegis ZS2 C7NVP-1435US

Scores 89 overall, wins 1 of 7 usage categories and 8 of 26 specs.

MSI Aegis ZS2 C7NVP-1435US Besser bei:

Home Office

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

GamingCreatorDeveloper

Auch in Betracht ziehen