HP Omen GT22 Black 2025
HP
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Lenovo ThinkCentre M75q Gen 5 2024
Lenovo
47 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Gaming
Workstation
Developer
Home Office
Business
Ai Llm
Creator
Compact
Spezifikationen
| HP Omen GT22 | Lenovo ThinkCentre M75q Gen 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K★ | AMD Ryzen 5 8500G |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 24★ | 6 |
| Frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB★ | 16 MB |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080★ | AMD Radeon 740M |
| GPU Benchmark Score | Keine Daten | |
| Type | discrete | integrated★ |
| VRAM | 16 GB★ | — |
| VRAM Type | GDDR7 | System Shared |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 64 GB★ | 16 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Storage 1 | 4 TB★ | 256 GB |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD | NVMe SSD★ |
| Storage 2 | 3.9 TB★ | — |
| Storage 2 Type | HDD★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Form Factor | mid-tower | mini |
| PSU | — | 65W★ |
| Weight | 22.59 kg | 1.25 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| USB Ports | 10★ | 6 |
| HDMI | 1x HDMI | 1x HDMI Output |
| DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort | 2x DisplayPort Output |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E★ |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3★ |
| Ethernet | RJ-45 | Gigabit Ethernet |
| System | ||
| OS | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Pro |
Vor- & Nachteile
HP Omen GT22 Black 2025
- Strong storage (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong port (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong cpu (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong ram (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Below average social proof (31th percentile)
Lenovo ThinkCentre M75q Gen 5 2024
- Strong port (73th percentile)
- Strong reliability (71th percentile)
- Below average social proof (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average gpu (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average storage (18th percentile)18th %ile
Preise
HP Omen GT22 Black 20250.032Score pro Dollar
vs
Lenovo ThinkCentre M75q Gen 5 20240.047Score pro Dollar
Lenovo ThinkCentre M75q Gen 5 2024 bietet 1.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: HP Omen GT22
Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 13 of 27 specs.
