BEASTCOM Q3 Q3-515 2024
BEASTCOM
54 Gesamtbewertung
vs
ACEMAGIC K1 Mini PC K1
ACEMAGIC
56 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Compact
Home Office
Business
Gaming
Workstation
Developer
Creator
Spezifikationen
| BEASTCOM Q3 Q3-515 | ACEMAGIC K1 Mini PC K1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | 4.6 GHz ryzen_7 | AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | Keine Daten | |
| Cores | 8★ | 4 |
| Frequency | 4.6 GHz★ | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 4 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | Integrated Graphics | integrated★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | Keine Daten | |
| Type | integrated★ | discrete |
| VRAM | 8 GB | 16 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | GDDR6★ | — |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB★ | 512 GB |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD | SSD |
| Build | ||
| Form Factor | Tower | mini |
| Weight | 8.69 kg | 1.22 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | — | 1★ |
| USB Ports | — | 6★ |
| Thunderbolt | — | USB3.2 Gen2 Type-C |
| HDMI | HDMI | 1x HDMI 2.0b |
| DisplayPort | — | 1x DisplayPort 1.4 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.2★ |
| Ethernet | — | Gigabit Ethernet |
| System | ||
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Pro |
Vor- & Nachteile
BEASTCOM Q3 Q3-515 2024
- Strong cpu (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong social proof (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average ram (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average port (25th percentile)
ACEMAGIC K1 Mini PC K1
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong port (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average cpu (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average ram (29th percentile)
- Below average storage (29th percentile)
Preise
BEASTCOM Q3 Q3-515 20240.081Score pro Dollar
vs
ACEMAGIC K1 Mini PC K10.178Score pro Dollar
ACEMAGIC K1 Mini PC K1 bietet 2.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: ACEMAGIC K1 Mini PC K1
Scores 56 overall, wins 3 of 7 usage categories and 9 of 25 specs.
