BEASTCOM Q3 Q3-515 2024
BEASTCOM
51 Gesamtbewertung
vs
HP Z2 Z2 G9 2024
HP
86 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Home Office
Business
Workstation
Developer
Compact
Creator
Gaming
Spezifikationen
| BEASTCOM Q3 Q3-515 | HP Z2 Z2 G9 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | 4.6 GHz ryzen_7 | Intel Core i9 14900K★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | Keine Daten | |
| Cores | 8 | 24★ |
| Frequency | 4.6 GHz★ | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 36 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | Integrated Graphics | NVIDIA RTX A4000★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | Keine Daten | |
| Type | integrated★ | discrete |
| VRAM | 8 GB | 16 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | GDDR6★ | — |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 32 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB | 1 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD | NVMe SSD★ |
| Build | ||
| Form Factor | Tower | sff |
| PSU | — | 550W★ |
| Weight | 8.69 kg | 5.00 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | — | 1★ |
| USB Ports | — | 10★ |
| HDMI | HDMI | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a Output |
| DisplayPort | — | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6★ | — |
| Bluetooth | — | No |
| Ethernet | — | Gigabit Ethernet |
| System | ||
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Pro for Workstations |
Vor- & Nachteile
BEASTCOM Q3 Q3-515 2024
- Strong cpu (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average ram (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average port (21th percentile)
HP Z2 Z2 G9 2024
- Strong cpu (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong port (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong ram (76th percentile)
- Strong storage (72th percentile)
Preise
BEASTCOM Q3 Q3-515 20240.077Score pro Dollar
vs
HP Z2 Z2 G9 20240.023Score pro Dollar
BEASTCOM Q3 Q3-515 2024 bietet 3.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: HP Z2 Z2 G9
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 25 specs.
