FLATIC
FLATIC
33 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Kodak Charmera Charmera
Kodak
29 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Beginner
Video
Product Photography
Youtube
Photography
Sports Wildlife
Wedding Events
Streaming
Travel
Vlogging
Spezifikationen
| FLATIC | Kodak Charmera Charmera | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | 1/3-inch | 1/2.3-inch |
| Megapixels | 64 MP★ | 1.600000023841858 MP |
| ISO Range | — | 100★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 30 fps★ |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 5K | 1080p★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 30 fps★ |
| Log Profile | ✓★ | — |
| Codec | — | AVI |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Touchscreen | — | ✗ |
| Build | ||
| Weight | 0.78 kg★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB | — | USB-C★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
FLATIC
- Strong video (77th percentile)
- Strong sensor (75th percentile)
- Strong social proof (68th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average display (26th percentile)
- Below average burst (29th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (32th percentile)
Kodak Charmera Charmera
- Strong burst (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average sensor (0th percentile)0th %ile
- Below average video (21th percentile)
- Below average display (26th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (32th percentile)
Preise
FLATIC0.615Score pro Dollar
vs
Kodak Charmera Charmera0.149Score pro Dollar
FLATIC bietet 4.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: FLATIC
Scores 33 overall, wins 9 of 10 usage categories and 3 of 13 specs.
