Canon EOS RP RP 2019
Canon
62 Gesamtbewertung
vs
FLATIC
FLATIC
32 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Streaming
Youtube
Vlogging
Beginner
Video
Product Photography
Photography
Sports Wildlife
Wedding Events
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Canon EOS RP RP | FLATIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | full-frame | 1/3-inch |
| Megapixels | 26.200000762939453 MP | 64 MP★ |
| ISO Range | 100★ | — |
| Processor | DIGIC 8 | — |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | Keine Daten | |
| AF Type | Phase Detection: 4779 | — |
| Eye AF | ✓★ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 5 fps★ | — |
| Max Shutter | 1/4000 | — |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓★ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K★ | 5K |
| 4K FPS | 25 fps★ | — |
| 1080p FPS | 60 fps★ | — |
| 10-bit | ✗ | — |
| Log Profile | ✗ | ✓★ |
| RAW Video | ✗ | — |
| Codec | H.264/MP4 | — |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3"★ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✓★ | — |
| Articulating | ✓★ | — |
| EVF Resolution | 2.4M dots★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | — |
| Weight | 0.48 kg★ | 0.78 kg |
| Battery Life | 270 shots★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓★ | — |
| Bluetooth | ✓★ | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0★ | — |
| HDMI | Mini-HDMI | — |
| Hot Shoe | ✓★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Canon EOS RP RP 2019
- Strong af (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong video (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong social proof (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average battery (2th percentile)2th %ile
- Below average burst (27th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (30th percentile)
FLATIC
- Strong video (75th percentile)
- Strong sensor (74th percentile)
- Strong social proof (66th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average display (24th percentile)
- Below average burst (27th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (30th percentile)
Preise
Canon EOS RP RP 20190.099Score pro Dollar
vs
FLATIC0.587Score pro Dollar
FLATIC bietet 5.9x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Canon EOS RP RP
Scores 62 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 18 of 30 specs.
