Denash
Denash
37 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Panasonic LUMIX G9 II G9 II Black 2024
Panasonic
89 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Wedding Events
Sports Wildlife
Beginner
Video
Youtube
Photography
Travel
Product Photography
Vlogging
Streaming
Spezifikationen
| Denash | Panasonic LUMIX G9 II G9 II | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | — | MOS |
| Size | — | micro-four-thirds |
| Megapixels | 75 MP★ | 25.209999084472656 MP |
| ISO Range | — | 100★ |
| Processor | — | Venus Engine |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | Keine Daten | |
| AF Type | — | Phase Detection: 779 |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Animal AF | — | ✓★ |
| Subject Detection | — | ✓★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 75 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | — | 75 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/32000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 5K | 4K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 60 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 240 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✓★ |
| Log Profile | ✓ | ✓ |
| RAW Video | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | — | H.264 ALL-Intra/H.265 Long GOP 4:2:2/4:2:0 8/10-Bit, ProRes 422/ProRes 422 HQ |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3" | 3" |
| Touchscreen | — | ✓★ |
| Articulating | ✓ | ✓ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 3.7M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.57 kg★ |
| Battery Life | — | 370 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✓★ |
| USB | — | USB-C 3.1/3.2 Gen 2★ |
| HDMI | — | HDMI Output |
| Hot Shoe | — | ✓★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Denash
- Strong sensor (78th percentile)
- Strong video (76th percentile)
- Below average burst (28th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (32th percentile)
- Below average af (33th percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX G9 II G9 II Black 2024
- Strong burst (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong video (93th percentile)93th %ile
Preise
Denash0.491Score pro Dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX G9 II G9 II Black 20240.105Score pro Dollar
Denash bietet 4.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX G9 II G9 II
Scores 89 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 21 of 33 specs.
