Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II 2016
Olympus
75 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Hasselblad 907X & CFV 100C 907X & CFV 100C
Hasselblad
52 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Sports Wildlife
Streaming
Beginner
Vlogging
Youtube
Travel
Wedding Events
Product Photography
Photography
Video
Spezifikationen
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II | Hasselblad 907X & CFV 100C 907X & CFV 100C | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | MOS | BSI CMOS |
| Size | micro-four-thirds | medium-format |
| Megapixels | 20.299999237060547 MP | 100 MP★ |
| ISO Range | 200 | 64★ |
| Processor | TruePic VIII | Hasselblad Natural Color Solution (HNCS) |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | ||
| AF Type | Contrast Detection: 121 (121 Cross-Type)Contrast Detection: 121 | Photo, VideoPhase Detection: 294 |
| Eye AF | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Animal AF | ✗ | ✗ |
| Subject Detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 15 fps★ | — |
| Burst (Electronic) | 60 fps★ | — |
| Max Shutter | 1/16000 | 1/6000 |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓ | ✓ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K★ | 1080p |
| 4K FPS | 30 fps★ | — |
| 1080p FPS | 120 fps★ | — |
| 10-bit | ✗ | — |
| Log Profile | ✗ | — |
| RAW Video | ✗ | — |
| Codec | H.264/MOV | — |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3" | 3.2"★ |
| Touchscreen | ✓ | ✓ |
| Articulating | ✓ | ✓ |
| EVF Resolution | 2.4M dots | 2.4M dots |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.50 kg★ | 0.62 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | ✗ |
| USB | USB-C (USB 2.0) | USB-C |
| HDMI | Micro-HDMI | — |
| Hot Shoe | ✓ | ✓ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II 2016
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong build (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong burst (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83th percentile)83th %ile
Hasselblad 907X & CFV 100C 907X & CFV 100C
- Strong sensor (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong display (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Strong evf (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Strong af (77th percentile)
- Below average video (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average burst (27th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (30th percentile)
Preise
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II 20160.029Score pro Dollar
vs
Hasselblad 907X & CFV 100C 907X & CFV 100C0.007Score pro Dollar
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II 2016 bietet 4.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II
Scores 75 overall, wins 9 of 10 usage categories and 8 of 32 specs.
