Sirui Sirui IronStar 35mm T1.9 Anamorphic 1.5x Lens Review

The Sirui IronStar 35mm T1.9 brings a true anamorphic cinema look to budget-conscious shooters. It's a sharp, specialized tool for video, but its manual focus and hefty build mean it's not for everyone.

Focal Length 35mm
Mount Interchangeable Mount with Included ARRI PL/Canon EF
Stabilization No
Weather Sealed No
Weight 1000 g
Sirui Sirui IronStar 35mm T1.9 Anamorphic 1.5x Lens lens
42 Overall Score

The 30-Second Version

The Sirui IronStar 35mm T1.9 is a budget-friendly, full-frame anamorphic lens that delivers a genuine cinematic widescreen look. It's sharp, has a fast aperture for low light, and includes both PL and EF mounts. Just know it's manual focus only and built specifically for video, not photography.

Overview

If you're hunting for that cinematic widescreen look without dropping five figures on a Cooke, the Sirui IronStar 35mm T1.9 Anamorphic lens is a serious contender. It's a full-frame prime lens designed specifically for video, with a 1.5x anamorphic squeeze that gives you those classic oval bokeh and horizontal lens flares. For around $999, you get a fast T1.9 aperture for low light and shallow depth of field, plus an interchangeable mount system that comes with both ARRI PL and Canon EF adapters right in the box. This isn't your everyday photography lens; it's a tool built for filmmakers and content creators who want to add a distinct, professional look to their projects.

Performance

This lens is all about the image character, not autofocus speed. Our optical analysis puts it in the 97th percentile for its category, which means the glass is sharp and well-corrected where it counts. The T1.9 aperture is fast, landing in the 30th percentile, which is decent but not class-leading. The real story is the anamorphic look: the 1.5x squeeze gives you a wider aspect ratio without cropping your sensor, and the 16-blade aperture creates smooth, oval-shaped bokeh that's a dead giveaway of the anamorphic style. The neutral flares are subtle and controlled, not the blue-streaked Hollywood kind, which some shooters prefer for a more modern look.

Performance Percentiles

AF 46.3
Bokeh 71.8
Build 18.3
Macro 47.3
Optical 96.9
Aperture 29.7
Versatility 38.3
Stabilization 37.7

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Delivers authentic 1.5x anamorphic look with oval bokeh and neutral flares at a fraction of the cost of high-end cine lenses. 97th
  • Interchangeable PL and EF mounts included, offering great flexibility for different camera systems. 72th
  • Fast T1.9 maximum aperture is excellent for low-light shooting and achieving shallow depth of field.
  • 0.8 MOD gearing and 270° focus rotation are pro-friendly features for use with follow focuses.
  • Full-frame coverage means it works on a wide range of cinema and mirrorless cameras with the right adapter.

Cons

  • Manual focus only, with no autofocus or stabilization—this is purely a filmmaker's tool. 18th
  • Minimum focus distance of 650mm (about 26 inches) is quite long, limiting close-up shots. 30th
  • Hefty 1000g weight and 95mm front diameter make it a chunky piece of glass to handle.
  • Build quality scores in the 20th percentile, so it may not feel as bombproof as some competitors.
  • Not versatile at all; our data scores it at 39th percentile for general use. This is a one-trick pony, but it's a very good trick.

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Focal Length Min 35
Focal Length Max 35
Elements 20
Groups 16

Aperture

Diaphragm Blades 16

Build

Mount Interchangeable Mount with Included ARRI PL/Canon EF
Format Full-Frame (46 mm Image Circle)
Weight 1.0 kg / 2.2 lbs
Filter Thread 92

AF & Stabilization

Stabilization No

Focus

Min Focus Distance 650
Max Magnification 1:23.26

Value & Pricing

At $999, the IronStar 35mm sits in a sweet spot. It's significantly more affordable than dedicated anamorphic lenses from companies like Atlas or Vazen, while offering a more authentic anamorphic look than cheaper 'anamorphic-style' filters or lenses. You're paying for the optical design and the interchangeable mount system. If your main goal is to get the anamorphic squeeze and character, this lens delivers that for a reasonable sum. If you just want a fast 35mm prime for general use, there are far better and cheaper options.

$999

vs Competition

This lens doesn't really compete with standard photo lenses like the Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S or the Viltrox 35mm f/1.7. Those are autofocus lenses for run-and-gun shooting and photography. The IronStar's real competition is other budget anamorphic options. Compared to the Meike 55mm F1.8 Pro, the Sirui offers a faster aperture (T1.9 vs F1.8), a wider focal length, and a dedicated 1.5x anamorphic design versus Meike's more hybrid approach. The Sirui is heavier and more specialized. Against something like the Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8, there's no contest for versatility—the zoom wins. But for that specific anamorphic 'look,' the Sirui is in a league of its own at this price.

Spec Sirui Sirui IronStar 35mm T1.9 Anamorphic 1.5x Lens Tamron Tamron Di III Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens for Sony Meike Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF Canon Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Lens Nikon Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR Lens (Nikon Z) Panasonic Panasonic LUMIX G Vario 14-140mm f/3.5-5.6 II
Focal Length 35mm 17-70mm 55mm 24mm 16-50mm 14-140mm
Max Aperture f/2.8 f/1.4 f/1.8 f/2.8 f/3.5
Mount Interchangeable Mount with Included ARRI PL/Canon EF Sony E Mount Nikon Z Canon RF Nikon Z Micro Four Thirds
Stabilization false true true true true true
Weather Sealed false false false false false false
Weight (g) 1000 544 281 269 329 27
AF Type Autofocus STM Autofocus Autofocus
Lens Type Zoom Zoom Zoom Telephoto

Common Questions

Q: Is the Sirui IronStar 35mm good for photography?

Not really. It's a manual-focus cine lens designed for video. The long minimum focus distance and lack of autofocus make it impractical for most photography, though you could use it for planned portrait sessions if you don't mind focusing manually.

Q: How does this lens compare to using an anamorphic adapter?

A dedicated lens like the IronStar typically provides better overall image quality, less light loss, and a more integrated look than pairing a spherical lens with a front-mounted anamorphic adapter. It's a cleaner, more purpose-built solution.

Q: What's a budget matte box that works with this lens for close focus?

Based on user solutions, compact matte boxes like the SmallRig Mini Matte Box Lite are popular budget choices that can accommodate the lens's 92mm filter thread and allow for close-focusing without vignetting.

Q: Can I use this on a Sony E-mount camera?

Yes, but you'll need an additional adapter. The lens comes with PL and EF mounts. To use it on a Sony E-mount body, you'd need a PL-to-E or EF-to-E adapter, which are widely available.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this lens if you need autofocus for vlogging or run-and-gun documentary work. Also, pass if you primarily shoot still photography—get a standard autofocus prime instead. If you need macro capabilities or extremely close focusing, the 26-inch minimum distance will be a deal-breaker. For travelers or anyone prioritizing a lightweight kit, the 2.2-pound weight and lack of versatility make it a poor choice. Look at a compact zoom or a standard 35mm f/1.8 instead.

Verdict

So, should you buy it? If you're a filmmaker, YouTuber, or wedding videographer who's been wanting to experiment with or commit to an anamorphic look, this lens is a fantastic and relatively low-risk entry point. The image quality is there, and the included dual mounts are a huge perk. But if you need autofocus, shoot mostly photos, or need to get super close to your subject, this lens will frustrate you. It's a specialized tool that excels at one very specific job: making your video look like a movie.