Sirui Sirui IronStar Series 35, 45 & 60mm T1.9 Review

The Sirui IronStar anamorphic lens set brings Hollywood's favorite widescreen look within reach of indie filmmakers, but its manual operation and odd filter size demand some compromises.

Focal Length 35mm
Mount Interchangeable Mount with Included ARRI PL/Canon EF
Stabilization No
Weather Sealed No
Weight 1000 g
Sirui Sirui IronStar Series 35, 45 & 60mm T1.9 lens
42.2 Overall Score

The 30-Second Version

The Sirui IronStar 35/45/60mm T1.9 set delivers genuine anamorphic character at an impressively accessible price. You get sharp optics, a useful three-lens range, and that classic cinematic widescreen look. Just be ready for fully manual operation and the occasional headache from its non-standard 92mm filter thread.

Overview

If you're hunting for a cinematic look without Hollywood-level prices, the Sirui IronStar anamorphic lens set is probably on your radar. This three-lens kit gives you 35mm, 45mm, and 60mm primes, all at a fast T1.9 aperture and designed to cover full-frame sensors. The big draw here is the anamorphic effect—you get those classic horizontal lens flares and a widescreen 2.39:1 aspect ratio when you de-squeeze your footage. At around $2,850 for the set, it's positioned as an entry point for indie filmmakers and content creators who want that distinctive anamorphic character but are working with mirrorless or cinema cameras on a budget.

Performance

Our optical testing puts these lenses in the 97th percentile for sharpness and clarity, which is impressive for a set at this price. You're getting a clean, detailed image, especially when stopped down a bit from T1.9. The bokeh quality scores well too, landing in the 72nd percentile, so out-of-focus areas have a pleasing, organic look. Just know these are pure manual cinema lenses—there's no autofocus (46th percentile) or image stabilization (36th percentile). You're trading convenience for that specific anamorphic optical signature. The 16-blade aperture helps keep bokeh balls looking nice and round even as you stop down.

Performance Percentiles

AF 45.7
Bokeh 72
Build 19.6
Macro 45.5
Optical 97
Aperture 29.6
Versatility 38.7
Stabilization 36.5

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Delivers genuine 2x anamorphic squeeze for cinematic widescreen look 97th
  • Excellent optical sharpness for the price point 72th
  • Useful three-lens focal length set covers many shooting scenarios
  • Interchangeable PL and EF mounts offer camera system flexibility
  • Includes circular polarizer and variable ND filter in the kit

Cons

  • 92mm filter thread is non-standard and can be expensive to outfit 20th
  • Fully manual operation with no autofocus or stabilization 30th
  • Relatively heavy at 1kg per lens
  • Minimum focus distance of 65cm isn't great for tight shots
  • Build quality scores lower than some competitors

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Focal Length Min 35
Focal Length Max 35
Elements 20
Groups 16

Aperture

Diaphragm Blades 16

Build

Mount Interchangeable Mount with Included ARRI PL/Canon EF
Format Full-Frame (46 mm Image Circle)
Weight 1.0 kg / 2.2 lbs
Filter Thread 92

AF & Stabilization

Stabilization No

Focus

Min Focus Distance 650
Max Magnification 1:23.26

Value & Pricing

At just under $3,000 for three anamorphic primes, the IronStar set is one of the most accessible ways to get into the anamorphic game. You're paying about $950 per lens, which is a steal compared to single Cooke or ARRI anamorphics that cost more than this entire kit. The included polarizer and variable ND add to the value. The trade-off is you're getting a more modest build and that oddball 92mm filter size, but for the image quality you get, it's a compelling package for budget-conscious filmmakers.

$2,849

vs Competition

This set lives in a niche between stills lenses and ultra-expensive cinema glass. Compared to something like the Meike 55mm F1.8 Pro, you're getting a completely different tool—the Meike is an autofocus stills lens, while the IronStars are manual anamorphics built for video. Against the Viltrox 35mm F1.7, you again lose autofocus but gain the anamorphic squeeze and a more robust cinema lens design. If you're considering the Nikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.8 S, ask yourself: do you need autofocus for photography, or do you want manual anamorphic lenses for video? They're solving different problems. The IronStars make the most sense if you're specifically chasing that anamorphic look.

Spec Sirui Sirui IronStar Series 35, 45 & 60mm T1.9 Meike Meike 50mm F1.8 Full Frame AF STM Lens Standard Viltrox VILTROX 35mm F1.7 Lens, X Mount 35mm F1.7 Auto Canon Canon - RF28-70mm F2.8 IS STM Standard Zoom Lens Panasonic Panasonic LUMIX G Vario 14-140mm f/3.5-5.6 II Fujifilm VILTROX 25mm F1.7 f/1.7 AF Lens for Fuji X Mount,
Focal Length 35mm 50mm 35mm 28-70mm 14-140mm 25mm
Max Aperture f/1.8 f/1.7 f/2.8 f/3.5 f/1.7
Mount Interchangeable Mount with Included ARRI PL/Canon EF Nikon Z Fujifilm X Canon RF Micro Four Thirds Fujifilm X
Stabilization false true true true true true
Weather Sealed false false false false false false
Weight (g) 1000 301 301 499 27 400
AF Type STM STM Autofocus STM
Lens Type Standard Zoom Telephoto

Common Questions

Q: What cameras are the Sirui IronStar lenses compatible with?

They come with interchangeable ARRI PL and Canon EF mounts, so they'll work with any cinema camera or DSLR/mirrorless camera that uses those mounts. They cover full-frame sensors, so they're great for cameras like the Canon C70, Blackmagic URSA, or full-frame mirrorless bodies with an EF adapter.

Q: Is the Sirui IronStar set good for photography?

Not really. These are manual cinema lenses designed for video. The lack of autofocus and the anamorphic squeeze make them impractical for most photography. You'd be better off with a standard autofocus prime lens for stills work.

Q: How do you deal with the 92mm filter thread size?

It's a pain point. 92mm filters are rare and expensive. Most owners use step-up rings to more common sizes like 95mm or 100mm, or invest in a matte box system that doesn't rely on screw-in filters.

Q: What's the difference between anamorphic and regular lenses?

Anamorphic lenses squeeze the image horizontally onto the sensor. When you de-squeeze it in editing, you get a wider aspect ratio (like 2.39:1), oval bokeh, and distinctive horizontal lens flares. Regular spherical lenses don't create this effect.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this set if you need autofocus for documentary work or solo shooting. Also, if you're primarily a photographer, these manual anamorphics will frustrate you—look at the Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S or similar instead. Travel videographers should avoid them too; at 1kg each and with no stabilization, they're not exactly run-and-gun friendly. And if you're on a tight filter budget, that 92mm thread will be a constant annoyance.

Verdict

Should you buy the Sirui IronStar anamorphic set? If you're a filmmaker or serious video creator who's been wanting to experiment with anamorphic lenses without taking out a second mortgage, then absolutely. The image quality is legitimately great for the price, and having three focal lengths gives you real flexibility on set. But if you need autofocus for run-and-gun shooting, or if you mostly shoot stills, this isn't the right tool. These are specialized cinema lenses that demand a deliberate, manual approach to filmmaking.