Reflex Camera Review
The Reflex Camera ND64 filter boasts 99th percentile build quality, but a missing price and key specs make it a puzzling product to judge.
Overview
The Reflex Camera 77mm ND64 filter is a bit of a puzzle. It's a simple screw-on filter, but the data we have for it is weirdly detailed, scoring it against lenses for things like autofocus and bokeh. That doesn't make sense for a filter, so we're going to ignore most of those percentiles. What matters is the build quality, which is rated in the 99th percentile. That means this piece of glass feels solid.
It's a 77mm ND64 filter, which cuts your light by 6 stops. That's a serious chunk of light reduction, perfect for getting those silky smooth waterfall shots or using a wide aperture in bright sunlight. At 68 grams, it's not adding much weight to your lens, which is always a plus.
Performance
Performance for a filter is straightforward: does it cut the light without messing up your image? An ND64 (6-stop) filter does the first job perfectly. The 99th percentile build score suggests the glass is high quality and the metal ring is well-machined, so you shouldn't see weird color casts or a loss of sharpness. That's the main event. All those other scores for AF and bokeh are irrelevant here. A filter doesn't have autofocus. It just sits there and darkens the scene, and if it's built well, it does that job without introducing problems.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Strong build (99th percentile) 99th
Cons
- Below average macro (18th percentile) 22th
- Below average bokeh (27th percentile) 27th
- Below average aperture (28th percentile) 30th
- Below average optical (33th percentile) 35th
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Focal Length Min | 77 |
| Focal Length Max | 77 |
Build
| Weight | 0.1 kg / 0.1 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 77 |
Value & Pricing
We can't talk value because there's no price. That's a huge missing piece. A well-built 77mm ND64 filter from a brand like B+W or Hoya can run you $80 to $150. If this Reflex Camera filter is priced competitively in that range, the 99th percentile build might make it a good pick. If it's cheaper, it could be a steal. If it's more expensive, you'd need to see some exceptional optical tests to justify it. Without a number, this whole section is a guess.
vs Competition
Comparing filters is about brand trust and price. A Meike or Viltrox lens might be a competitor in the system data, but for filters, you'd look at brands like Hoya, B+W, or Tiffen. The key trade-off is usually price versus coating quality. A budget Hoya HD might have great build for $50, while a B+W XS-Pro with nano coating hits $120. This Reflex filter's 99th percentile build suggests it's aiming at that premium tier. You'd need to check if it has multi-coating to reduce flares and if its optical glass matches the build quality. Against a known brand, this filter is an unknown entity unless the price and specs are clear.
| Spec | Reflex Camera | Sigma Art Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Art Lens for Sony E | Raspberry Pi Arducam 35mm F1.6 Mirrorless C-Mount Lens for | Nikon NIKKOR Altura Photo 55MM 0.43x HD Wide Angle Lens with | Canon Altura Photo 49MM 0.43x HD Wide Angle Lens with | Sony Lightdow 55MM 0.43x High-Definition Wide Angle + |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 77mm | 35mm | 35mm | - | - | - |
| Max Aperture | - | f/1.4 | f/1.6 | f/3.5 | - | - |
| Mount | - | Sony E | C Mount | Screw-on lens fits camera lenses with a 55mm front filter thread | Screw-on lens fits camera lenses with a 49mm front filter thread | Canon EF-M, Sony E |
| Stabilization | false | false | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | false | false | false | false | false |
| Weight (g) | 68 | 641 | 113 | 320 | 298 | 320 |
| AF Type | - | Autofocus | - | STM | STM | STM |
| Lens Type | - | Wide-Angle | Telephoto | Wide-Angle | Wide-Angle | Wide-Angle |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Af | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | Versatility | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reflex Camera | 46.4 | 26.6 | 99.4 | 21.7 | 34.6 | 29.7 | 37.5 | 37.9 |
| Sigma Art 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Compare | 46.4 | 95 | 57.5 | 65.2 | 87.5 | 88.1 | 37.5 | 37.9 |
| Raspberry Pi Arducam 35mm F1.6 Mirrorless C-Mount Compare | 46.4 | 75.2 | 98 | 93.2 | 34.6 | 81.7 | 37.5 | 87.7 |
| Nikon NIKKOR Altura Photo 55MM 0.43x HD Wide Angle Compare | 95.6 | 35.8 | 76 | 89.1 | 34.6 | 41.1 | 37.5 | 87.7 |
| Canon Altura Photo 49MM 0.43x HD Wide Angle Compare | 95.6 | 26.6 | 78.8 | 91.5 | 34.6 | 29.7 | 37.5 | 87.7 |
| Sony Lightdow 55MM 0.43x High-Definition Wide Angle + Macro Compare | 95.6 | 26.6 | 76 | 89.1 | 34.6 | 29.7 | 37.5 | 87.7 |
Verdict
Here's the deal: the 99th percentile build score is promising. It hints this could be a really well-made piece of kit. The ND64 density is useful. But we're missing the two most important things: a price and confirmed details on anti-reflective coatings. Without those, it's impossible to give a real recommendation. If you find it for sale, check the price against a Hoya ProND1000 or a B+W 110 ND. If it's significantly cheaper with similar specs, it might be worth a shot based on that build score. Otherwise, stick with a known brand where the optical performance is a sure thing.