Sigma Sigma Contemporary Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary Lens Review
The Sigma 16-300mm is the ultimate convenience lens, but you pay for that zoom range with mediocre image quality and a lot of weight.
Overview
Alright, let's talk about this Sigma 16-300mm lens. It's a superzoom, which means it tries to do everything from wide-angle landscapes to distant telephoto shots. That's a huge range in one lens, and it's heavy at nearly 1.2kg. The idea is you never have to change lenses, which sounds great for travel or if you just hate carrying a bag full of gear.
Performance
The zoom range is the main event here, and it's in the 100th percentile for versatility. That's the good news. The not-so-good news is that everything else is pretty average or below. The autofocus is just okay, ranking in the 48th percentile. The optical stabilization is a bit weak at the 42nd percentile, so don't expect miracles in low light. And the image quality, while decent, lands in the lower third of lenses. You're trading a lot of performance for that massive zoom.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- The 16-300mm zoom range is incredibly versatile. 100th
- You only need one lens for most situations. 96th
- FLD and SLD glass help control color fringing. 87th
- Autofocus is fast enough for general use. 77th
Cons
- Image quality is mediocre compared to primes or shorter zooms.
- It's big and heavy at 1188g.
- Build quality is in the bottom 3rd percentile.
- The variable f/3.5-6.7 aperture gets slow fast.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | Zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 |
| Focal Length Max | 300 |
| Elements | 20 |
| Groups | 14 |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/22 |
| Constant | Yes |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 |
Build
| Mount | L-Mount |
| Format | APS-C |
| Weight | 0.6 kg / 1.4 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 67 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Yes |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 170 |
| Max Magnification | 1:2 |
Value & Pricing
At $694, this lens asks a lot. You're paying a premium for convenience, not for top-tier image quality or build. If having one lens on your camera at all times is your absolute top priority, then maybe. But for that money, you could get two or three sharper, faster primes that would blow this out of the water in their specific areas.
Price History
vs Competition
Let's look at the competition. The Sony FE 24-240mm is a more direct rival for full-frame cameras, offering similar 'do-it-all' convenience in a lighter package. For Fujifilm shooters, the Viltrox 25mm f/1.7 is a fraction of the price and offers vastly better low-light performance and bokeh, but you lose the zoom. The Panasonic 14-140mm is a much more manageable superzoom for Micro Four Thirds, with better stabilization. This Sigma sits in a weird spot: it's a DSLR-era superzoom in a world moving towards mirrorless.
| Spec | Sigma Sigma Contemporary Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary Lens | Tamron Tamron Di III Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens for Sony | Meike Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF | Nikon Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8 VR Lens (Nikon Z) | Viltrox VILTROX 23mm F1.4 Auto Focus APS-C Frame Lens for | Canon Canon L Canon RF 35mm f/1.4 L VCM Lens (Canon RF) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 16-300mm | 17-70mm | 55mm | 16-50mm | 23mm | 35mm |
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/2.8 | f/1.4 | f/2.8 | f/1.4 | f/1.4 |
| Mount | L-Mount | Sony E Mount | Nikon Z | Nikon Z | Fujifilm X | Canon RF |
| Stabilization | true | true | true | true | true | false |
| Weather Sealed | false | false | false | false | false | true |
| Weight (g) | 615 | 544 | 281 | 329 | 499 | 544 |
| AF Type | Autofocus | Autofocus | STM | Autofocus | STM | Autofocus |
| Lens Type | Zoom | Zoom | — | Zoom | — | Zoom |
Verdict
Buy this lens only if you are a DSLR shooter who values not changing lenses above all else. If you're a hobbyist traveler who wants a single lens solution and can accept the trade-offs in size and image quality, it could work. For everyone else, especially those who care about sharpness, low-light performance, or portability, look at a two-lens kit or a different system's superzoom.