Bose Bose QuietComfort Ultra True Wireless Review
The Bose QC Ultra Earbuds 2 offer great comfort and features, but our tests show their sound and ANC aren't the best. At $299, that's a tough sell.
The 30-Second Version
The Bose QC Ultra Earbuds 2 are comfortable, feature-packed, and well-loved, but their sound and ANC aren't class-leading. For $299, you're buying the Bose experience more than top-tier performance. Worth it for comfort seekers, but spec hunters should look at Sony.
Overview
The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds 2nd Gen are Bose's latest attempt to lock down the premium wireless earbud space. They come packed with features like spatial audio and adaptive noise canceling, promising a personalized, immersive experience.
At $299, they're firmly in the luxury tier. You're paying for the Bose name and their signature noise-canceling tech, but our data shows they're not the all-around champs they claim to be.
Performance
Let's be real, the noise canceling is good, but it's not class-leading anymore. Our database puts their ANC performance in the 41st percentile, which is surprising for a Bose product. The sound quality lands in a similar spot. The battery life is decent at 24 hours total with the case, sitting around the 60th percentile. The real standout is their social proof score, which is in the 93rd percentile. People really like these things, even if the raw specs don't always back that up.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- The noise canceling is solid and adaptive to your environment. 98th
- Spatial audio mode adds a fun, immersive layer for movies and music. 96th
- Battery life is reliable for a full day of use. 96th
- They have a strong reputation and high user satisfaction. 88th
Cons
- Sound and ANC performance aren't class-leading for the price.
- Connectivity scores are surprisingly low in our tests.
- The microphone quality is just okay for calls.
- They are very expensive.
The Word on the Street
Specifications
Full Specifications
Design
| Form Factor | In-Ear |
| Wearing Style | Dual Ear True Wireless Earbud |
| Weight | 0.0 kg / 0.0 lbs |
Audio
| Driver Type | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes |
| Codecs | aptX Adaptive |
| Surround | Spatial Audio |
Noise Control
| ANC | Yes |
Connectivity
| Wireless | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 |
| Profiles | A2DP, HFP |
| Multipoint | Yes |
| Range | 9.1 |
Earbud Battery
| Battery Life | 6 |
| Charge Time | 3 |
| Fast Charging | 20min=2hrs |
| Charging | USB-C |
Case Battery
| Case Battery | 18 |
| Case Charging | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | Yes |
Microphone
| Microphone | Yes |
| NC Mic | Yes |
Features
| Touch Controls | Yes |
| App | iOS, Android |
| Volume Limiting | No |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 |
Value & Pricing
At $299, the value proposition is tough. You're paying a premium for the Bose brand and their comfort-focused design. If top-tier, chart-topping sound and ANC are your only goals, this price tag is hard to justify based on our performance data. But if you prioritize a comfortable, reliable fit and trusted brand experience over absolute technical supremacy, there's value here.
Price History
vs Competition
Stacked against the Sony WF-1000XM5, the Bose loses on pure ANC and sound quality metrics. The Sony's are simply more powerful. Compared to something like the Nothing Ear (a), the Bose wins on build and features but gets absolutely demolished on price-to-performance. The Technics EAH-AZ100 offers a more reference-focused sound profile for audiophiles. Your choice here is between Bose's polished, comfortable ecosystem and competitors that often offer more raw power for the same or less money.
| Spec | Bose Bose QuietComfort Ultra True Wireless | Sony Sony WF-1000XM5 Noise-Canceling True Wireless | Technics Technics EAH-AZ80 Noise-Canceling True Wireless | Bose Bose QuietComfort Ultra True Wireless | Apple Airpods Pro 3 Apple AirPods Pro with Wireless MagSafe Charging | Jabra Jabra Evolve2 Buds USB-C MS Earbuds with USB-C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Form Factor | In-Ear | In-Ear | In-Ear | In-Ear | In-Ear | In-Ear |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Sony WF-1000XM5 Noise-Canceling True Wireless In-Ear Headphones (Black) | Dynamic | Dynamic | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Wireless | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| Active Noise Cancellation | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Battery Life Hours | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 |
| Case Battery Hours | 18 | 16 | 16 | 18 | 24 | 25 |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IPX4 | IPX4 | IPX4 | IP57 | IP57 |
| Multipoint | true | true | true | true | true | true |
Common Questions
Q: Is the noise canceling better than Sony's?
Based on our performance data, no. The Bose ANC scores in the 41st percentile, while the Sony WF-1000XM5 typically ranks much higher for pure noise blocking.
Q: How is the call quality?
The microphone scores are middling in our tests. It's fine for quick calls, but don't expect studio-level clarity in noisy environments.
Q: Are they worth the upgrade from the first gen?
If you really want spatial audio and the latest adaptive features, maybe. But for core noise canceling and sound, the improvement isn't massive according to our benchmarks.
Who Should Skip This
Skip these if you're on a tight budget or chase the highest possible spec scores. The Nothing Ear (a) offers shocking value, and the Sony WF-1000XM5 delivers more powerful ANC. Also, hardcore gamers should avoid them; our data shows they're one of the weakest picks for gaming in this category.
Verdict
Buy these if you're a Bose loyalist who values supreme comfort and a seamless, feature-rich experience over having the absolute best specs. They're fantastic for travel and everyday listening where reliability and brand trust matter. Just know you're paying for the logo as much as the performance.