Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5" SM-X200 Gray 2022
Samsung
38 综合评分
vs
Microsoft Surface Pro 13" Pro 11 Platinum 2024
Microsoft
74 综合评分
评分
Art Design
Entertainment
Productivity
Student
Reading
Business
规格
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5" SM-X200 | Microsoft Surface Pro 13" Pro 11 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | 2 GHz | Intel Core Ultra 7 266V★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | 无数据 | |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| GPU | — | Arc Graphics★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | 无数据 | |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 16 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | — | LPDDR5X★ |
| Storage | 32 GB | 1 TB★ |
| Storage Type | — | SSD★ |
| Expandable | — | ✗ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 10.5" | 13" |
| Resolution | 1200 px | 2880 px★ |
| Panel | LCD | LCD |
| Refresh Rate | — | 120 Hz★ |
| Brightness | — | 900 nits★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7★ |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4★ |
| USB-C | 1 | 2★ |
| Cellular | ✗ | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Stylus Support | — | ✓★ |
| Stylus Model | — | Surface Slim Pen |
| Fingerprint Reader | — | ✗ |
| Face Unlock | — | ✓★ |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 0.71 kg★ | 0.88 kg |
| Battery | — | 47 Wh★ |
| OS | Android 11 | Windows 11 Pro |
优缺点
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5" SM-X200 Gray 2022
- Strong cpu (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Strong gpu (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Strong battery (71th percentile)
- Below average storage (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average feature (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average screen (27th percentile)
- Below average ram (32th percentile)
Microsoft Surface Pro 13" Pro 11 Platinum 2024
- Strong battery (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong storage (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong screen (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (94th percentile)94th %ile
价格
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5" SM-X200 Gray 20220.017每美元得分
vs
Microsoft Surface Pro 13" Pro 11 Platinum 20240.001每美元得分
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5" SM-X200 Gray 2022 性价比高 17.0 倍
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 10.5" SM-X200 Gray 2022
Microsoft Surface Pro 13" Pro 11 Platinum 2024
结论
胜出: Microsoft Surface Pro 13" Pro 11
Scores 74 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 17 of 26 specs.
