Razer Blade Blade 14 2025
Razer
67 Загальна оцінка
vs
ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 Quiet Blue
ASUS
63 Загальна оцінка
Оцінки
Gaming
Entertainment
Creator
Compact
Developer
Student
Business
Характеристики
| Razer Blade Blade 14 | ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 Processor (30MB Cache, 2.97GHz, 8 cores, 8 Threads); Qualcomm Hexagon NPU up to 45TOPS |
| Cores | 10★ | 8 |
| Frequency | 2.0 GHz | 3.0 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB★ | — |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★ | Qualcomm Adreno GPU |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | discrete | integrated★ |
| VRAM | 8 GB★ | — |
| VRAM Type | GDDR7 | Shared |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 32 GB★ | 16 GB |
| RAM Generation | — | LPDDR5X★ |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB★ | 512 GB |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD | NVMe SSD★ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 14" | 16" |
| Resolution | 2560 px★ | 1920 px |
| Panel | OLED★ | IPS |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz★ | 60 Hz |
| Brightness | — | 300 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | — | 45% NTSC |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB Ports | — | 2★ |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E★ |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.3★ |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.63 kg★ | 1.88 kg |
| Battery | 72 Wh★ | 50 Wh |
| OS | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home |
Плюси та мінуси
Razer Blade Blade 14 2025
- Strong gpu (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong screen (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong cpu (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong ram (73th percentile)
- Below average reliability (3th percentile)3th %ile
- Below average port (22th percentile)
ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 Quiet Blue
- Strong cpu (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong ram (67th percentile)
- Below average compact (22th percentile)
Ціни
Razer Blade Blade 14 20250.001балів за долар
vs
ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 Quiet Blue0.004балів за долар
ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 Quiet Blue пропонує у 4.0x краще співвідношення ціна-якість
Razer Blade Blade 14 2025
ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 Quiet Blue
Вердикт
Переможець: Razer Blade Blade 14
Scores 67 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 12 of 27 specs.
