Dell Pro Slim QCS1250 2025
Dell
90 Pontuação geral
vs
HP 27 Touchscreen All-in-One Desktop Computer 27"
HP
63 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Home Office
Business
Developer
Workstation
Compact
Ai Llm
Creator
Gaming
Especificações
| Dell Pro Slim QCS1250 | HP 27 Touchscreen All-in-One Desktop Computer 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | Intel Core i9 14900K★ | Intel Core Ultra 7 155U |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 24★ | 12 |
| Frequency | 5.6 GHz★ | 2.0 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB★ | 12 MB |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Intel Graphics★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | integrated | integrated |
| VRAM | 32 GB★ | — |
| VRAM Type | Shared | — |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 64 GB★ | 32 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB | 1 TB |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD★ | — |
| Storage 2 | 1 TB★ | — |
| Storage 2 Type | SSD★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Form Factor | sff | All-in-One |
| Weight | 5.90 kg | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 1★ | — |
| USB Ports | 6★ | — |
| HDMI | 1x HDMI 2.1 | — |
| DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6★ | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth | — |
| Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet | — |
| System | ||
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Pro |
Prós e Contras
Dell Pro Slim QCS1250 2025
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong ram (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong cpu (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong storage (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average gpu (32th percentile)
HP 27 Touchscreen All-in-One Desktop Computer 27"
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong ram (72th percentile)
- Strong reliability (72th percentile)
- Below average port (8th percentile)8th %ile
Preços
Dell Pro Slim QCS1250 20250.002pontos por dólar
vs
HP 27 Touchscreen All-in-One Desktop Computer 27"0.001pontos por dólar
Dell Pro Slim QCS1250 2025 oferece 2.0x melhor custo-benefício
Dell Pro Slim QCS1250 2025
HP 27 Touchscreen All-in-One Desktop Computer 27"
Veredito
Vencedor: Dell Pro Slim QCS1250
Scores 90 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 13 of 26 specs.
