HP Pro Mini 400 G9
HP
59 Pontuação geral
vs
Dell Pro Slim QCS1250 2025
Dell
90 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Home Office
Business
Developer
Workstation
Compact
Ai Llm
Creator
Gaming
Especificações
| HP Pro Mini 400 G9 | Dell Pro Slim QCS1250 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | Intel Core i5 12500T | Intel Core i9 14900K★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 6 | 24★ |
| Frequency | 2.0 GHz | 5.6 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB | 36 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | integrated | integrated |
| VRAM | — | 32 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 64 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Storage 1 | 256 GB | 1 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| Storage 2 | — | 1 TB★ |
| Storage 2 Type | — | SSD★ |
| Build | ||
| Form Factor | mini | sff |
| PSU | 90W★ | — |
| Weight | — | 5.90 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB Ports | 5 | 6★ |
| HDMI | 1x HDMI 2.1 | 1x HDMI 2.1 |
| DisplayPort | 2x DisplayPort 1.4 | 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.2★ | Bluetooth |
| Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet |
| System | ||
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Pro |
Prós e Contras
HP Pro Mini 400 G9
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong reliability (72th percentile)
- Strong port (67th percentile)
- Below average ram (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average storage (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average gpu (32th percentile)
Dell Pro Slim QCS1250 2025
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong ram (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong cpu (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong storage (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average gpu (32th percentile)
Preços
HP Pro Mini 400 G90.003pontos por dólar
vs
Dell Pro Slim QCS1250 20250.002pontos por dólar
HP Pro Mini 400 G9 oferece 1.5x melhor custo-benefício
HP Pro Mini 400 G9
Dell Pro Slim QCS1250 2025
Veredito
Vencedor: Dell Pro Slim QCS1250
Scores 90 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 12 of 27 specs.
