FLATIC
FLATIC
32 Pontuação geral
vs
Reolink Argus Argus PT
Reolink
33 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Video
Product Photography
Beginner
Photography
Sports Wildlife
Wedding Events
Youtube
Travel
Streaming
Vlogging
Especificações
| FLATIC | Reolink Argus Argus PT | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | — |
| Size | 1/3-inch | — |
| Megapixels | 64 MP★ | 5 MP |
| Autofocus | ||
| Subject Detection | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 5K | — |
| Log Profile | ✓★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.78 kg | 0.75 kg★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✗ |
Prós e Contras
FLATIC
- Strong video (75th percentile)
- Strong sensor (74th percentile)
- Strong social proof (66th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average display (24th percentile)
- Below average burst (27th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (30th percentile)
Reolink Argus Argus PT
- Strong build (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong social proof (70th percentile)
- Below average sensor (2th percentile)2th %ile
- Below average video (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average display (24th percentile)
- Below average burst (27th percentile)
Preços
FLATIC0.020pontos por dólar
vs
Reolink Argus Argus PT0.006pontos por dólar
FLATIC oferece 3.3x melhor custo-benefício
FLATIC
Reolink Argus Argus PT
Veredito
Empate
Both products are closely matched — FLATIC wins 2 specs while Reolink Argus Argus PT wins 4.
