Laowa Zero-D 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D 9mm
Laowa
50 종합 점수
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Sony
89 종합 점수
점수
Video Cinema
Street
Budget
Professional
Travel
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
사양
| Laowa Zero-D 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D 9mm | Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 9 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 9 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | 15 | 9 |
| Groups | 10 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 3★ | 1 |
| Coating | Frog Eye Coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | 2.8 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Sony E |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.21 kg | 0.12 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 49 mm | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 120 mm★ | 249 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.13x | 0.215x★ |
장단점
Laowa Zero-D 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D 9mm
- Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong optical (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong bokeh (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
가격
Laowa Zero-D 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D 9mm0.007달러당 점수
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.027달러당 점수
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm 3.9배 더 나은 가성비
Laowa Zero-D 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D 9mm
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
결론
승자: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.
