JBL Tune 770NC
JBL
86 종합 점수
vs
Fostex TH616
Fostex
31 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Commute
Music
Work
Gaming
Calls
Studio
사양
| JBL Tune 770NC | Fostex TH616 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | open |
| Foldable | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.23 kg★ | 0.37 kg |
| Ear Cushion | — | vegan leather |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic Driver | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 50 mm★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 5 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 45 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 25 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB★ | 96 dB |
| Codecs | JBL Tune 770NC - Adaptive Noise Cancelling with Smart Ambient Wireless Over-Ear Headphones, Bluetooth 5.3, Up to 70H Battery Life with Speed Charge, Lightweight, Comfortable & Foldable Design (Black) | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | — |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | — | 3 m |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 70 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 5min=3hrs | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| App | JBL Headphones | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | — |
| Water Resistance | Water-Resistant | — |
장단점
JBL Tune 770NC
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong build (92th percentile)92th %ile
Fostex TH616
- Strong sound (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong build (77th percentile)
- Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average comfort (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average mic (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average anc (31th percentile)
가격
JBL Tune 770NC0.031달러당 점수
vs
Fostex TH6160.002달러당 점수
JBL Tune 770NC 15.5배 더 나은 가성비
JBL Tune 770NC
Fostex TH616
결론
승자: JBL Tune 770NC
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 32 specs.
