Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 100 1001608
Beyerdynamic
72 종합 점수
vs
Technics EAH-A800
Technics
92 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Commute
Work
Calls
Budget
Music
Studio
사양
| Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 100 1001608 | Technics EAH-A800 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | on-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.22 kg★ | 0.30 kg |
| Ear Cushion | replaceable ear pads | super-soft earpads |
| Headband | aluminium and textile elements | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic | PEEK/Polyurethane 3-Layer Diaphragm |
| Driver Size | 45 mm★ | 40 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 4 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 22 kHz | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 48 Ω | 34 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 105 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC | SBC, AAC, LDAC |
| Surround | — | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear Headphones with 2 Device Multipoint Connectivity - EAH-A800-K Black | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear | Technics | Black | Over Ear | Over E |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | Active | Dual Hybrid feedforward & feedback |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.4★ | 5.2 |
| Profiles | AVDTP 1.3, AVCTP 1.4, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, RFCOMM 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6.2, HFP 1.9 | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | USB-C | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | — | ✓★ |
| Cable Length | — | 1 m |
| Range | 15 m★ | 10.100000381469727 m |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 60 hrs★ | 50 hrs |
| Charge Time | 0.25 hrs★ | 3 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 15-minute charge for up to 15 hours of listening time | 10 hours (NC ON) |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Capacity | 630 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2 | 8★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | ✗ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant | — |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✗ |
| App | beyerdynamic app | Technics Audio Connect |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
장단점
Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 100 1001608
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong battery (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong anc (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average social proof (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average build (35th percentile)
Technics EAH-A800
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (20th percentile)20th %ile
가격
Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 100 10016080.011달러당 점수
vs
Technics EAH-A8000.007달러당 점수
Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 100 1001608 1.6배 더 나은 가성비
Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 100 1001608
Technics EAH-A800
결론
승자: Technics EAH-A800
Scores 92 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 5 of 41 specs.
