Jabra Evolve2 Evolve2 Buds
Jabra
89 종합 점수
vs
Sony WF-1000XM4
Sony
29 종합 점수
점수
Fitness
Calls
Budget
Travel
Commute
Gaming
Music
사양
| Jabra Evolve2 Evolve2 Buds | Sony WF-1000XM4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | S, M, L | — |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 6 mm | 6 mm |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 80 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 8 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | — | 140 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | AAC, SBC | LDAC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | Adjustable | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.2★ | — |
| Profiles | A2DP 1.3, AVRCP 1.6, HFP 1.7, HSP 1.2, SPP 1.2 | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Range | 20 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 5 Minutes for 1 Hour | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 33 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | iOS, Android | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IP57 | — |
장단점
Jabra Evolve2 Evolve2 Buds
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong comfort (93th percentile)93th %ile
Sony WF-1000XM4
- Strong sound (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong anc (71th percentile)
- Strong mic (66th percentile)
- Below average comfort (1th percentile)1th %ile
- Below average battery (3th percentile)3th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average build (33th percentile)
가격
Jabra Evolve2 Evolve2 Buds0.012달러당 점수
vs
Sony WF-1000XM40.006달러당 점수
Jabra Evolve2 Evolve2 Buds 2.0배 더 나은 가성비
Jabra Evolve2 Evolve2 Buds
Sony WF-1000XM4
결론
승자: Jabra Evolve2 Evolve2 Buds
Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 34 specs.
