EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+
EarFun
89 종합 점수
vs
Apple AirPods A2031
Apple
19 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Budget
Travel
Calls
Fitness
Commute
Music
사양
| EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+ | Apple AirPods A2031 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | — |
| Ear Tips | s | — |
| Weight | 0.05 kg★ | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | hybrid | — |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 2★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | aptX Lossless, LDAC, LC3, LE Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | — |
| ANC Type | adaptive hybrid | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | — |
| Profiles | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 12 hrs | 20 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 10 min for 2 hours playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 54 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant | Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | EarFun Audio App | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IP55 | — |
장단점
EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
Apple AirPods A2031
- Below average battery (22th percentile)
- Below average social proof (25th percentile)
- Below average sound (28th percentile)
- Below average comfort (28th percentile)
가격
EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+0.060달러당 점수
vs
Apple AirPods A20310.022달러당 점수
EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+ 2.7배 더 나은 가성비
EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+
Apple AirPods A2031
결론
승자: EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+
Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 37 specs.
