Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Apple
91 종합 점수
vs
Technics EAH-AZ80 EAH-AZ80-K
Technics
67 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Travel
Commute
Calls
Fitness
Gaming
Music
사양
| Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A | Technics EAH-AZ80 EAH-AZ80-K | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | — |
| Ear Tips | XXS, XS, S, M, L | — |
| Weight | 0.09 kg | 0.06 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | Apple AirPods Pro 3 Wireless Earbuds, Active Noise Cancellation, Live Translation, Heart Rate Sensing, Hearing Aid Feature, Bluetooth Headphones, Spatial Audio, High-Fidelity Sound, USB-C Charging | LDAC |
| Surround | Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | Adaptive Audio | — |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | 7 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 5 minutes in the case provides around 1 hour of listening time | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 24 hrs | 24 hrs |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2 | 8★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | Technics Audio Connect |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IP57 | — |
장단점
Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Technics EAH-AZ80 EAH-AZ80-K
- Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong anc (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average battery (21th percentile)
- Below average build (33th percentile)
결론
승자: Apple AirPods Pro MFHP4LL/A
Scores 91 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 5 of 31 specs.